Abstract
The effects of different planting patterns on oat(Neinongda You 1) yield and some physiological characters were studied under saline-alkaline stress condition in severe saline land of Sarachih town Baotou city suburb of Inner Mongolia.The results showed that the oat yield in mixed-cropping was higher than monoculture,and yield in mixed-cropping of oat and alfalfa was the maximum.,the economical output was 1 028.4 kg/ha,hay yield was 9 082.5 kg/ha,and they were 2.09 times and 1.69 times that of sole oat cropping,respectively.Physiological index determination showed that the relative permeability of plasmalemma,MDA content,proline content and chlorophyll content increased at first and then gradually decline with the development of oat,the relative permeability of plasmalemma of the oat which mixed with alfalfa was the lowest during different growth stages,the change of the MDA content was relatively smooth,and it was lower and the content of chlorophyll was higher than other treatments at late growth stage.The oat mixed with alfalfa can increase saline-alkaline resistance of oat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed cropping produced higher oat yield than monoculture.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- mixed-croppinge0
- Outcome
- oat yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the oat yield in mixed-cropping was higher than monoculture”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat and alfalfa mixed cropping produced maximum economic output of 1 028.4 kg/ha, 2.09 times sole oat cropping.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- mixed-cropping of oat and alfalfae0
- Outcome
- economical outpute0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1 028.4 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2.09 timese0
- Comparator
- sole oat croppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield in mixed-cropping of oat and alfalfa was the maximum.,the economical output was 1 028.4 kg/ha,hay yield was 9 082.5 kg/ha,and they were 2.09 times and 1.69 times that of sole oat cropping,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat and alfalfa mixed cropping produced 9 082.5 kg/ha hay, 1.69 times sole oat cropping.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- mixed-cropping of oat and alfalfae0
- Outcome
- hay yielde0
- Value
- 9 082.5 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 1.69 timese0
- Comparator
- sole oat croppinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield in mixed-cropping of oat and alfalfa was the maximum.,the economical output was 1 028.4 kg/ha,hay yield was 9 082.5 kg/ha,and they were 2.09 times and 1.69 times that of sole oat cropping,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Membrane permeability, MDA, proline and chlorophyll rose then gradually declined during oat development.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- relative permeability of plasmalemma,MDA content,proline content and chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increased at first and then gradually declinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the relative permeability of plasmalemma,MDA content,proline content and chlorophyll content increased at first and then gradually decline with the development of oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat mixed with alfalfa had the lowest membrane permeability across growth stages.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- mixed with alfalfae0
- Outcome
- relative permeability of plasmalemmae0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the relative permeability of plasmalemma of the oat which mixed with alfalfa was the lowest during different growth stages”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat mixed with alfalfa had relatively smooth MDA changes and lower MDA late in growth.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- mixed with alfalfae0
- Outcome
- MDA contente0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the relative permeability of plasmalemma of the oat which mixed with alfalfa was the lowest during different growth stages,the change of the MDA content was relatively smooth,and it was lower and the content of chlorophyll was higher than other treatments at late growth stage.”
t0“oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat mixed with alfalfa had higher chlorophyll than other treatments late in growth.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativat0
- Outcome
- content of chlorophylle0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the content of chlorophyll was higher than other treatments at late growth stage.”
t0“oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing oat with alfalfa increased oat saline-alkaline resistance.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- mixed with alfalfae0
- Outcome
- saline-alkaline resistance of oate0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The oat mixed with alfalfa can increase saline-alkaline resistance of oat.”
The same questions in other papers
Medicago sativa · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →intercropping · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.