Paper · 2008 · Journal of Northwest A & F University

Study on soil nutrients in apple orchard and balanced fertilization in shaanxi Weibei dry-land

Zhao Ying

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 The research is to study the effect of balance fertilization on apple fruit yield and quality in order to apply the theoretical foundation for the high quality of apple production in Weibei plateau.【Meyhod】 Totally 64 soil samples were taken in grid from apple achard in Xiuli villagge of Shaanxi Weibei dry-land and effects of different fertilizer treatments on apple fruit yield and apple quality were studied.【Result】 The results by ASI method indicated that 36.1%,41.7%,80.6% and 77.8% of soil samples for the content of available N,available K,available Zn and available Mn went under the critical value.13.9%,11.1% and 16.7% of the soil samples for the content of available P,available S and available Fe were under the critical value.It shows that the soil was poor in available N,K,Zn and available Mn and abundent in available P,S and Fe in the area respectively.The 3-year experiment showed that fertilizer supply could increase apple yield in the range from 12.6% to 36.4%.The order of increase rate among N,P and K was NKP.【Conclusion】 Only the balanced application of N,P and K can have the best of the apple yield,quality and benefit.The reasonable quantity of fertilization should be N 0.3 kg/tree,P2O5 0.1 kg/tree,K2O 0.25 kg/tree,and it's necessary to apply some of Zn and Mn fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available N, K, Zn and Mn were below critical values in 36.1%, 41.7%, 80.6% and 77.8% of orchard soils.

Outcome
content of available N,available K,available Zn and available Mne0
Direction
undere0
Value
36.1%,41.7%,80.6% and 77.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“36.1%,41.7%,80.6% and 77.8% of soil samples for the content of available N,available K,available Zn and available Mn went under the critical value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available P, S and Fe were below critical values in 13.9%, 11.1% and 16.7% of soils.

Outcome
content of available P,available S and available Fee0
Direction
undere0
Value
13.9%,11.1% and 16.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13.9%,11.1% and 16.7% of the soil samples for the content of available P,available S and available Fe were under the critical value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer increased apple yield by 12.6% to 36.4%.

Treatment
fertilizer supplye0
Outcome
apple yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.6% to 36.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer supply could increase apple yield in the range from 12.6% to 36.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increase ranked N, K, P.

Outcome
order of increase ratee0
Qualifier
NKPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The order of increase rate among N,P and K was NKP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced N, P and K gave best apple yield, quality and benefit.

Treatment
balanced application of N,P and Ke0
Outcome
apple yield,quality and benefite0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced application of N,P and K can have the best of the apple yield,quality and benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend N 0.3 kg/tree, P2O5 0.1 kg/tree and K2O 0.25 kg/tree.

Outcome
reasonable quantity of fertilizatione0
Value
N 0.3 kg/tree,P2O5 0.1 kg/tree,K2O 0.25 kg/treee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reasonable quantity of fertilization should be N 0.3 kg/tree,P2O5 0.1 kg/tree,K2O 0.25 kg/tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend some Zn and Mn fertilizer.

Outcome
apply some of Zn and Mn fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it's necessary to apply some of Zn and Mn fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑

potassium · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.