Paper · 2015

Effect of Different Sugar Content Grapes on the Influence of Raisin

Li Cha

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking ‘Thompsons Seedless',‘Centennial Seedless',‘Flame Seedless' grapes as test materials in Turpan main producing areas,the effect of different sugar content grapes on the influence of raisin were studied with the methods of drying in the sun,dry shade and whether for the dry agent processing.The results showed that dried rates were different in the same sugar levels and between different varieties,even if the same sugar content,the same species,different treatment,the dried rates were different.No matter what varieties,what kind of treatment,with the higher sugar,the higher the rate of dried,and the more superior quality,appearance and taste,therefore select brix of 20% or more.In contrast,no cleaning after using the dry agent could save time to dry,and beautiful color,dried the optimal effect,followed by alkaline cleaning,the worst was no alkali treatment.Shadow of dry mode,the color of raisins was kept better.Preparation of raisins,its moisture control was different because of different varieties,when moisture content of‘Thompsons Seedless' raisins was controlled between 11%to 16%,that had attractive appearance,full particles,natural taste,less than 11%,the contained caramel and dry particles,more than 16%,the raisins wetter,high moisture,poor taste.Moisture of‘Centennial Seedless' and‘Flame Seedless' raisins were controlled in 8%to 13%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raisin drying rates differed across sugar levels and grape varieties.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
different varietiese0
Outcome
dried ratese0
Direction
differente0

Verbatim

e0

“dried rates were different in the same sugar levels and between different varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raisin drying rates differed across drying treatments even for the same sugar content and grape variety.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
different treatmente0
Outcome
dried ratese0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
same sugar content,the same speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“even if the same sugar content,the same species,different treatment,the dried rates were different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grape sugar content was associated with a higher raisin drying rate.

Taxon
Grapest0
Compound
sugare0
Outcome
rate of driede0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“with the higher sugar,the higher the rate of dried”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher grape sugar content was associated with better raisin quality, appearance and taste.

Taxon
Grapest0
Compound
sugare0
Outcome
quality,appearance and tastee0
Direction
more superiore0

Verbatim

e0

“with the higher sugar,the higher the rate of dried,and the more superior quality,appearance and taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend selecting grapes with brix of 20% or more for raisins.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
select brix of 20% or moree0
Value
20% or moree0

Verbatim

e0

“therefore select brix of 20% or more”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Not cleaning grapes after dry agent use produced the best drying effect and attractive color while saving drying time.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
no cleaning after using the dry agente0
Outcome
save time to dry,and beautiful color,dried the optimal effecte0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
alkaline cleaninge0

Verbatim

e0

“no cleaning after using the dry agent could save time to dry,and beautiful color,dried the optimal effect,followed by alkaline cleaning,the worst was no alkali treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade drying better maintained raisin color.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
Shadow of dry modee0
Outcome
color of raisinse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Shadow of dry mode,the color of raisins was kept better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thompsons Seedless raisins at 11% to 16% moisture had attractive appearance, full particles and natural taste.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Thompsons Seedlesse0
Outcome
attractive appearance,full particles,natural tastee0
Value
11%to 16%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“moisture content of‘Thompsons Seedless' raisins was controlled between 11%to 16%,that had attractive appearance,full particles,natural taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thompsons Seedless raisins below 11% moisture had caramel and dry particles.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Thompsons Seedlesse1
Outcome
caramel and dry particlese0
Value
less than 11%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“less than 11%,the contained caramel and dry particles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“moisture content of‘Thompsons Seedless' raisins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thompsons Seedless raisins above 16% moisture were wetter and had poor taste.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Thompsons Seedlesse1
Outcome
the raisins wetter,high moisture,poor tastee0
Value
more than 16%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“more than 16%,the raisins wetter,high moisture,poor taste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1275 · show in text ↑
e1

“moisture content of‘Thompsons Seedless' raisins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended moisture control range for Centennial Seedless raisins was 8% to 13%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Centennial Seedlesse0
Outcome
Moisturee0
Value
8%to 13%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture of‘Centennial Seedless' and‘Flame Seedless' raisins were controlled in 8%to 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended moisture control range for Flame Seedless raisins was 8% to 13%.

Taxon
Grapest0
Material
Flame Seedlesse0
Outcome
Moisturee0
Value
8%to 13%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Moisture of‘Centennial Seedless' and‘Flame Seedless' raisins were controlled in 8%to 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.