Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Grape Berry Acclimation to Excessive Solar Irradiance Leads to Repartitioning between Major Flavonoid Groups

N. Reshef; N. Agam; A. Fait

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Warm viticulture regions are associated with inferior wines, resulting from the interaction between microclimate and fruit biochemistry. Solar irradiance triggers biosynthetic processes in the fruit and dominates its thermal balance. Therefore, deciphering its impact on fruit metabolism is pivotal to develop strategies for fruit protection and ameliorate its quality traits. Here, we modified light quality and intensity in the fruit-zone and integrated micrometeorology with grape and wine metabolomics, allowing a complete assessment, from field to bottle. We analyzed the dynamics of fruit's adaptation to altered conditions during ripening and constructed temporal-based metabolic networks. Micrometeorological modifications shifted the balance between the major flavonoids, associating increased solar exposure with lower levels of anthocyanins and flavan-3-ols, and higher flavonols. Differences were fixed from 2 weeks postveraison until harvest, suggesting a controlled acclimation response rather than external modulation. Differences in grape composition manifested in the wine and resulted in higher color intensity and improved wine hue under partial shading.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased solar exposure was associated with lower grape anthocyanin levels.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
increased solar exposuree0
Outcome
levels of anthocyaninse0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“associating increased solar exposure with lower levels of anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–851 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased solar exposure was associated with lower grape flavan-3-ol levels.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
increased solar exposuree0
Outcome
flavan-3-olse0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“associating increased solar exposure with lower levels of anthocyanins and flavan-3-ols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–868 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased solar exposure was associated with higher grape flavonol levels.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
increased solar exposuree0
Outcome
flavonolse0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“associating increased solar exposure with lower levels of anthocyanins and flavan-3-ols, and higher flavonols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–890 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape composition differences persisted from two weeks after veraison until harvest.

Taxon
Grapet0
Outcome
Differencese0
Qualifier
from 2 weeks postveraison until harveste0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences were fixed from 2 weeks postveraison until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–954 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpreted persistent differences as a controlled acclimation response.

Taxon
Grapet0
Outcome
controlled acclimation responsee0
Qualifier
rather than external modulatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“suggesting a controlled acclimation response rather than external modulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape composition differences also appeared in wine.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
Differences in grape composition manifested in the winee0

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in grape composition manifested in the wine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial shading produced higher wine color intensity.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
partial shadinge0
Outcome
color intensitye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher color intensity and improved wine hue under partial shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial shading improved wine hue.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
partial shadinge0
Outcome
wine huee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grape Berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher color intensity and improved wine hue under partial shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1172 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.