Paper · 2006 · Guoshu xuebao

Effects of shading on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Toyonoka strawberry cultivar

Zeng Ling

18
claims
34
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiment was conducted with potted strawberry cultivar Toyonoka for studying effects of shading on its photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics. The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower. Furthermore, shading increased the apparent quantum yield (AQY) and the CO2 compensation point (CCP), which represented that the plants would be more efficient to transfer light quantum into chemical energy under low light stress, but the affinity to CO2 was decreased. Because of shading, the highest sunlight intensity at noon, about 2000 μmol/m2·s, declined to 600 μmol/m2·s, and the diurnal variation, a double-peak curve, of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of strawberry under nature environment became a single-peak, and the daily accumulation of photosynthate decreased about 38%. Shading increased the leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) but the transpiration rate was lower than that of control, which was the result of lower temperature under shading. Shading also decreased the minimal fluorescence (Fo) but promoted the PSⅡmaximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), implying that shading might protect integration of the photosynthetic membrane systems and photochemical efficiency against the strong light stress. The results above indicated that shading was indeed beneficial for strawberry growth and alleviated photosynthetic photoinhibition, but it should be noted to increase CO2 concentration for strawberry under low light environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed petiole length, leaf area relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
petiole length, leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed content of chlorophyll and carotenoid relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll and carotenoide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed specific leaf weight (SLW) relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
specific leaf weight (SLW)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed carboxylation efficiency (CE) relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
carboxylation efficiency (CE)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed dark respiration (Rd) relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
dark respiration (Rd)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) relative to control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shading conditione0
Outcome
light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results showed that the petiole length, leaf area and the content of chlorophyll and carotenoid under shading condition were higher than those of control, but the specific leaf weight (SLW), carboxylation efficiency (CE), dark respiration (Rd), light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP) became lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased apparent quantum yield (AQY).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
apparent quantum yield (AQY)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Furthermore, shading increased the apparent quantum yield (AQY) and the CO2 compensation point (CCP), which represented that the plants would be more efficient to transfer light quantum into chemical energy under low light stress, but the affinity to CO2 was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading increased CO2 compensation point (CCP).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
CO2 compensation point (CCP)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Furthermore, shading increased the apparent quantum yield (AQY) and the CO2 compensation point (CCP), which represented that the plants would be more efficient to transfer light quantum into chemical energy under low light stress, but the affinity to CO2 was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased affinity to CO2.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
affinity to CO2e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Furthermore, shading increased the apparent quantum yield (AQY) and the CO2 compensation point (CCP), which represented that the plants would be more efficient to transfer light quantum into chemical energy under low light stress, but the affinity to CO2 was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced noon sunlight intensity from about 2000 to 600 μmol/m2·s.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
highest sunlight intensity at noone0
Direction
declinede0
Value
600 μmol/m2·se0
Qualifier
about 2000 μmol/m2·se0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Because of shading, the highest sunlight intensity at noon, about 2000 μmol/m2·s, declined to 600 μmol/m2·s, and the diurnal variation, a double-peak curve, of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of strawberry under nature environment became a single-peak, and the daily accumulation of photosynthate decreased about 38%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed the diurnal net photosynthetic rate curve from double peak to single peak.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
diurnal variation, a double-peak curve, of net photosynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Qualifier
became a single-peake0
Comparator
nature environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Because of shading, the highest sunlight intensity at noon, about 2000 μmol/m2·s, declined to 600 μmol/m2·s, and the diurnal variation, a double-peak curve, of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of strawberry under nature environment became a single-peak, and the daily accumulation of photosynthate decreased about 38%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased daily photosynthate accumulation about 38%.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
shadinge0
Outcome
daily accumulation of photosynthatee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Because of shading, the highest sunlight intensity at noon, about 2000 μmol/m2·s, declined to 600 μmol/m2·s, and the diurnal variation, a double-peak curve, of net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of strawberry under nature environment became a single-peak, and the daily accumulation of photosynthate decreased about 38%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed leaf stomatal conductance (Gs).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
leaf stomatal conductance (Gs)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading increased the leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) but the transpiration rate was lower than that of control, which was the result of lower temperature under shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading changed transpiration rate.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading increased the leaf stomatal conductance (Gs) but the transpiration rate was lower than that of control, which was the result of lower temperature under shading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading decreased minimal fluorescence (Fo).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
minimal fluorescence (Fo)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading also decreased the minimal fluorescence (Fo) but promoted the PSⅡmaximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), implying that shading might protect integration of the photosynthetic membrane systems and photochemical efficiency against the strong light stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading promoted PSⅡmaximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm).

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
PSⅡmaximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“strawberry cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–113 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading also decreased the minimal fluorescence (Fo) but promoted the PSⅡmaximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm), implying that shading might protect integration of the photosynthetic membrane systems and photochemical efficiency against the strong light stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1510 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that shading benefited strawberry growth and alleviated photoinhibition.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
strawberry growth and alleviated photosynthetic photoinhibitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results above indicated that shading was indeed beneficial for strawberry growth and alleviated photosynthetic photoinhibition, but it should be noted to increase CO2 concentration for strawberry under low light environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1739 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended increasing CO2 under low light.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
increase CO2 concentration for strawberry under low light environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results above indicated that shading was indeed beneficial for strawberry growth and alleviated photosynthetic photoinhibition, but it should be noted to increase CO2 concentration for strawberry under low light environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1739 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Shade produced smaller leaves than full light.

    EFFECTS OF SHADE ON STRAWBERRIES IN HYDROPONIC CULTIVATION · 2014 · compared with plants grown on upper tier that received 100% light

    Opposite direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

shade · physiology: pigments · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.