Paper · 2011 · Food and Machinery

Effect of storage temperature on quality of film packaged spinach

Honglei Zhang

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The quality changes of film packaged spinach stored at(0±0.5),(5±1),(10±1),(20±1)℃ were studied during storage.The results showed that spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate,the decomposition of chlorophyll,the decline of sensory quality, and the increase in nitrite content,therefore,it would prolong the shelf life of spinach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film-packaged spinach at (0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality.

Treatment
(0±0.5)℃e0
Outcome
preservation qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film packaging at cold storage inhibited an increase in spinach weight loss rate.

Treatment
film packaginge0
Outcome
weight loss ratee0
Direction
inhibit the increasee0
Qualifier
(0±0.5)℃e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film packaging at cold storage inhibited spinach chlorophyll decomposition.

Treatment
film packaginge0
Outcome
decomposition of chlorophylle0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate,the decomposition of chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film packaging at cold storage inhibited decline in spinach sensory quality.

Treatment
film packaginge0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate,the decomposition of chlorophyll,the decline of sensory quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film packaging at cold storage inhibited an increase in spinach nitrite content.

Treatment
film packaginge0
Outcome
nitrite contente0
Direction
inhibit the increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate,the decomposition of chlorophyll,the decline of sensory quality, and the increase in nitrite content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold storage with film packaging prolonged spinach shelf life.

Treatment
film packaginge0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
prolonge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach stored at(0±0.5)℃ had good preservation quality,which binding of film packaging could effectively inhibit the increase in weight loss rate,the decomposition of chlorophyll,the decline of sensory quality, and the increase in nitrite content,therefore,it would prolong the shelf life of spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–435 · show in text ↑

storage · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · quality: general · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · physiology: pigments · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.