Paper · 2013 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Effect of Potassium Management on Yield and Benefit of Processing Tomato

Qiao-lin Ma

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】Research applying different K content,application period and different varieties of potash fertilizer on processing tomato yield,the influence of the fertilizer effect.【Method】Through three different applying potash content,three application period and Three different varieties of potash fertilizer,using drip irrigation under membrane planting,in determination of harvest processing tomato plant,fruit weight, yield calculation,analysis of fertilizer efficiency.【Result】1 when potash fertilization period and at the same time,Potash application of 120 kg / hm2dosage of processing tomato yield is higher than the other; 2 when applying potash content phase at the same time,drip irrigation topdressing potassium 50% flowering period and 50% maximum drip irrigation topdressing stage results of processing tomato production,the potash All lowest basal application;3 Potash fertilization period phase at the same time,potassium deficiency,lack of enough k,k content is too high will reduce the economic benefits of processed tomatoes,applying potash content phase at the same time,the economic benefits of drip irrigation the topdressing and 50% period of potash 50% flowering stage drip irrigation topdressing higher than other application period; 4 The highest yield of potash K- KCl treatment of Processing tomato in different varieties of potash fertilizer,was followed by K- K 2 SO 4 、K-KNO 3,and potash fertilizer for K- KCl the best efficiency,followed by K- K 2 SO 4,and lowest K- KNO 3. 【Conclusion】This experiment preliminarily concluded: The most appropriate processing tomato potash fertilizer is 125. 89 kg / hm2,the most suitable drip irrigation topdressing potash fertilization period to 50% flowering period,results 50% drip irrigation topdressing stage,Processing tomato varieties of potash fertilizer,potash for K- KCl in the most appropriate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash application at 120 kg / hm2 gave a higher processing tomato yield than other rates.

Taxon
processing tomatoe1
Treatment
Potash application of 120 kg / hm2e1
Outcome
processing tomato yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
120 kg / hm2e1
Comparator
the othere1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Potash application of 120 kg / hm2dosage of processing tomato yield is higher than the other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation topdressing of 50% potash at the flowering stage gave higher economic benefits than other application periods.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
50% flowering stage drip irrigation topdressinge1
Outcome
economic benefitse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
other application periode1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the economic benefits of drip irrigation the topdressing and 50% period of potash 50% flowering stage drip irrigation topdressing higher than other application period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash K-KCl gave the highest processing tomato yield among the potash types tested, followed by K-K2SO4.

Taxon
Processing tomatoe1
Treatment
K- KCle1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
K- K 2 SO 4e1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest yield of potash K- KCl treatment of Processing tomato in different varieties of potash fertilizer,was followed by K- K 2 SO 4 、K-KNO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash K-KCl had the best fertilizer efficiency, followed by K-K2SO4.

Taxon
Processing tomatot0
Treatment
K- KCle1
Outcome
efficiencye1
Direction
beste1
Comparator
K- K 2 SO 4e1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“potash fertilizer for K- KCl the best efficiency,followed by K- K 2 SO 4,and lowest K- KNO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash K-KNO3 had the lowest fertilizer efficiency among the potash types tested.

Taxon
Processing tomatot0
Treatment
K- KNO 3e1
Outcome
efficiencye1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
K- KCle1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“potash fertilizer for K- KCl the best efficiency,followed by K- K 2 SO 4,and lowest K- KNO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1505 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The most appropriate processing tomato potash fertilizer rate is 125.89 kg/hm2.

Taxon
processing tomatoe1
Outcome
processing tomato potash fertilizere1
Value
125. 89 kg / hm2e1

Verbatim

e1

“The most appropriate processing tomato potash fertilizer is 125. 89 kg / hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1636 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The most suitable drip irrigation topdressing potash period is the 50% flowering period.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Outcome
drip irrigation topdressing potash fertilization periode1
Value
50% flowering periode1

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“the most suitable drip irrigation topdressing potash fertilization period to 50% flowering period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1734 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

K-KCl is the most appropriate potash fertilizer for processing tomato among the varieties tested.

Taxon
Processing tomatoe1
Treatment
K- KCle1
Outcome
potash fertilizere1

Verbatim

e1

“Processing tomato varieties of potash fertilizer,potash for K- KCl in the most appropriate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1871 · show in text ↑

potassium chloride · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

potassium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 67 positive, 13 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

stage · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 17 positive, 14 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.