Paper · 2015 · Jieshui guan'gai

Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields

Xin Tao

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper studied the effect of different irrigation and fertilization modes on cotton nitrogen absorption,utilization,distribution and yields under the Variable Control Fertilization mode and the Pressure Differential Fertigation mode.Plot experiment set different fertilization methods and irrigation fertilization modes to measure the total nitrogen of cotton,and eventually analyze cotton nitrogen absorption and utilization and yields under different fertilization methods.The plant nitrogen content and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of Variable Control Fertilization mode is higher than that of Pressure Differential Fertigation mode,and the average yield of the former is higher than that of the later by 5.27%.The N-W-N fertilization model with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is conducive to promote the growth and development of cotton reproductive organs,to increase the total nitrogen amount allocated in the cotton reproductive organs,to significantly improve the efficiency of nitrogen utilization to finally achieve the effect of increasing production.The fertilization mode(N-W-N)with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable Control Fertilization mode gave higher plant nitrogen content and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency than Pressure Differential Fertigation mode.

Treatment
Variable Control Fertilization modee0
Outcome
plant nitrogen content and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Pressure Differential Fertigation modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant nitrogen content and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of Variable Control Fertilization mode is higher than that of Pressure Differential Fertigation mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average cotton yield under Variable Control Fertilization was 5.27% higher than under Pressure Differential Fertigation.

Treatment
Variable Control Fertilization modee0
Outcome
average yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
5.27%e1
Comparator
Pressure Differential Fertigation modee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e0

“The plant nitrogen content and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency of Variable Control Fertilization mode is higher than that of Pressure Differential Fertigation mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–645 · show in text ↑
e1

“and the average yield of the former is higher than that of the later by 5.27%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N-W-N fertilization model promotes growth and development of cotton reproductive organs.

Organ / stage
cotton reproductive organse2
Treatment
N-W-N fertilization modele2
Outcome
growth and development of cotton reproductive organse2
Direction
promotee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The N-W-N fertilization model with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is conducive to promote the growth and development of cotton reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N-W-N fertilization model increases the total nitrogen amount allocated to cotton reproductive organs.

Organ / stage
cotton reproductive organse3
Treatment
N-W-N fertilization modele2
Outcome
total nitrogen amount allocated in the cotton reproductive organse3
Direction
increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The N-W-N fertilization model with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is conducive to promote the growth and development of cotton reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–953 · show in text ↑
e3

“to increase the total nitrogen amount allocated in the cotton reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The N-W-N fertilization model significantly improves the efficiency of nitrogen utilization.

Treatment
N-W-N fertilization modele2
Outcome
efficiency of nitrogen utilizatione4
Direction
improvee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The N-W-N fertilization model with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is conducive to promote the growth and development of cotton reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–953 · show in text ↑
e4

“to significantly improve the efficiency of nitrogen utilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N-W-N fertilization model is expected to achieve increasing production.

Treatment
N-W-N fertilization modele2
Outcome
productione5
Direction
increasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“The N-W-N fertilization model with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is conducive to promote the growth and development of cotton reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–953 · show in text ↑
e5

“to finally achieve the effect of increasing production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The N-W-N fertilization mode is recommended for cotton.

Outcome
fertilization mode(N-W-N)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Drip Irrigation Methods on Cotton Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“The fertilization mode(N-W-N)with fertilizer nitrogen at both ends of a fertilization process and irrigation in the middle one-third of the process is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1317 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.