Paper · 2013

Evaluation of drought resistance of Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas

Degang Zhang

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To understand the drought resistance mechanism of two species(Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas),changes of physiological and biochemical indexes were investigated under light(LS),moderate(MS) and severe(HS) drought stress for 0,10,20,30 and 40 days through controling soil volumetric woisture content with negative pressure water supplying and controlling devices.The results showed that with the increasing of drought stress intensities and stress periods,the relative water content(RWC) of two species displayed a reduction trend.Under severe drought stress,the decrease amplitude was significantly increased after 40 d,the RWC decreased to 30.08% and 25.27%,while the RWC of L.angustifolia was the lowest.Contrary leaf relative electrolytic leakage(REC),soluble sugar(SSC) and MDA contents followed an increasing trend.The REC of L.angustifolia increase amplitude beyond to 400% under severe drought stress and was significantly higher than that of L.stoechas.The MDA content of L.angustifolia was also higher than that of L.stoechas.Meanwhile,SOD and CAT activities firstly elevated and then declined.Compared to the L.angustifolia,the RWC,SOD and CAT activities of L.stoechas were higher,but the REC,SSC and MDA contents of L.stoechas were lower.Overall,L.stoechas exhibited a stronger ability to tolerant drought stress than L.angustifolia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content declined in both lavender species as drought intensity and duration increased.

Taxon
Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechasLavandula angustifoliaLavandula stoechast0
Treatment
drought stress intensities and stress periodse0
Outcome
relative water content(RWC)e0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with the increasing of drought stress intensities and stress periods,the relative water content(RWC) of two species displayed a reduction trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe drought reduced relative water content to 30.08% and 25.27% after 40 days.

Taxon
Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechasLavandula angustifoliaLavandula stoechast0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
RWCe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30.08% and 25.27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under severe drought stress,the decrease amplitude was significantly increased after 40 d,the RWC decreased to 30.08% and 25.27%,while the RWC of L.angustifolia was the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf electrolyte leakage, soluble sugar and MDA content increased with drought.

Taxon
Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechasLavandula angustifoliaLavandula stoechast0
Outcome
leaf relative electrolytic leakage(REC),soluble sugar(SSC) and MDA contentse0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
Contrarye0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrary leaf relative electrolytic leakage(REC),soluble sugar(SSC) and MDA contents followed an increasing trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe drought, L.angustifolia electrolyte leakage increased by over 400%, significantly more than in L.stoechas.

Taxon
L.angustifoliaLavandula angustifoliae0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
RECe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
400%e0
Comparator
L.stoechase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The REC of L.angustifolia increase amplitude beyond to 400% under severe drought stress and was significantly higher than that of L.stoechas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–968 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA content was higher in L.angustifolia than in L.stoechas.

Taxon
L.angustifoliaLavandula angustifoliae0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L.stoechase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MDA content of L.angustifolia was also higher than that of L.stoechas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD and CAT activities rose initially and then fell during drought.

Taxon
Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechasLavandula angustifoliaLavandula stoechast0
Outcome
SOD and CAT activitiese0
Direction
firstly elevated and then declinede0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula angustifolia
Lavandula angustifolia · TaxonAndrey Zharkikh · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meanwhile,SOD and CAT activities firstly elevated and then declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lavandula angustifolia and L.stoechas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L.stoechas had higher RWC, SOD and CAT activities than L.angustifolia.

Taxon
L.stoechasLavandula stoechase0
Outcome
RWC,SOD and CAT activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
L.angustifoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the L.angustifolia,the RWC,SOD and CAT activities of L.stoechas were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L.stoechas had lower REC, SSC and MDA than L.angustifolia.

Taxon
L.stoechasLavandula stoechase0
Outcome
REC,SSC and MDA contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
L.angustifoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the L.angustifolia,the RWC,SOD and CAT activities of L.stoechas were higher,but the REC,SSC and MDA contents of L.stoechas were lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that L.stoechas tolerates drought better than L.angustifolia.

Taxon
L.stoechasLavandula stoechase0
Outcome
stronger ability to tolerant drought stresse0
Comparator
L.angustifoliae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lavandula stoechas
Lavandula stoechas · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall,L.stoechas exhibited a stronger ability to tolerant drought stress than L.angustifolia.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1351 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Lavandula angustifolia (lavender)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.