Paper · 2015 · Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Drought Stress on the Yield and Metabolic Regulation at Different Growth Stages in Peanut

Zhang Ju

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The mid-season large-fruited cultivar Yuhua 9326 and early small-fruited Yuhua 9936 were used to investigate the impacts of drought stress on peanut yield and metabolic regulation at four different growth stages,i. e. seedling,flowering and pegging,podding and mature stage,which was conducted under artificial water control in a full-automatic rainproof tank. The results indicated that water deficiency in all four stages could reduce the yield and influence the metabolic regulation in leaves. Among all those stage,the yield reduction at flowering and pegging was the biggest,the yield reduction was about 25%,followed by seedling and podding,and the mature stage was the least. The results also showed that drought stress at flowering and pegging stage had the largest impacts on the activities of antioxidant enzyme and the content of osmotic adjustment substances and MDA. Under the drought stress at flowering and pegging,the activity of antioxidant enzyme reduced by more than 25%,the content of soluble protein decreased by about 40%,that of soluble sugar and free proline increased by more than 20% and that of MDA rose by about 55%. In conclusion,the flowering and pegging was the most sensitive stage to drought stress. This study identified the sensitive stage to water shortage and provided theoretical basis and technical guidance for scientific irrigation and yield improvement. It played an important role in the water utilization efficiency and per unit yield enhancement of arid and semi-arid areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency at all four stages reduced peanut yield.

Treatment
water deficiency in all four stagese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficiency in all four stages could reduce the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficiency influenced leaf metabolic regulation.

Treatment
water deficiency in all four stagese0
Outcome
metabolic regulation in leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficiency in all four stages could reduce the yield and influence the metabolic regulation in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reduction was greatest at flowering and pegging, about 25%.

Treatment
flowering and pegginge0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
biggeste0
Value
about 25%e0
Comparator
seedling and poddinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield reduction at flowering and pegging was the biggest,the yield reduction was about 25%,followed by seedling and podding,and the mature stage was the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering and pegging had the largest effect on antioxidant enzyme activity and osmotic substances and MDA content.

Treatment
drought stress at flowering and pegging stagee0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzyme and the content of osmotic adjustment substances and MDAe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress at flowering and pegging stage had the largest impacts on the activities of antioxidant enzyme and the content of osmotic adjustment substances and MDA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering and pegging, drought reduced antioxidant enzyme activity by more than 25%.

Treatment
drought stress at flowering and pegginge0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
more than 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the drought stress at flowering and pegging,the activity of antioxidant enzyme reduced by more than 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering and pegging, drought decreased soluble protein by about 40%.

Treatment
drought stress at flowering and pegginge0
Outcome
content of soluble proteine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the drought stress at flowering and pegging,the activity of antioxidant enzyme reduced by more than 25%,the content of soluble protein decreased by about 40%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering and pegging, drought increased soluble sugar and free proline by more than 20%.

Outcome
soluble sugar and free prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than 20%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of soluble sugar and free proline increased by more than 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering and pegging, drought raised MDA by about 55%.

Outcome
MDAe0
Direction
rosee0
Value
about 55%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“that of MDA rose by about 55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering and pegging was identified as the stage most sensitive to drought.

Organ / stage
flowering and pegginge0
Outcome
most sensitive stage to drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the flowering and pegging was the most sensitive stage to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

79 papers: 24 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Groundnut experienced lower drought-induced yield reduction than cowpea and green gram.

    Global Synthesis of Drought Effects on Food Legume Production · 2015 · compared with legumes such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and green gram (Vigna radiate)

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

stage · physiology: osmolytes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

stage · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 29 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.