Abstract
Fertilizer is the main cost and cultivation regulation factors of peanut production. The scientific manuring system is very important to guarantee good growth and high yield and quality. A three repetitions experiment was conducted to explor the respond of one- time fertilization and topdressing with 25%( N10- P6- K9) common compound fertilizer to peanut cultivar Cai- 51. The results indicated that fertilizer supplication was advantageous to pod yield. The suitable kind of fertilizer was 600 kg / hm2of base fertilizer,and it increased 19. 7% of the pod yield than that of no fertilizer. The excessive application of chemical fertilizers( 750 kg / hm2) inhibited peanuts' vegetative and reproductive growth in a certain extent,and then affected the pod yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
600 kg/hm2 of base fertiliser increased pod yield by 19.7% compared with no fertiliser.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Material
- Cai- 51e1
- Treatment
- 600 kg / hm2of base fertilizere3
- Outcome
- pod yielde3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Value
- 19. 7%e3
- Comparator
- no fertilizere3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to peanut cultivar Cai- 51”
e3“The suitable kind of fertilizer was 600 kg / hm2of base fertilizer,and it increased 19. 7% of the pod yield than that of no fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertiliser supply was advantageous to pod yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Material
- Cai- 51e1
- Treatment
- fertilizer supplicatione2
- Outcome
- pod yielde2
- Direction
- advantageouse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to peanut cultivar Cai- 51”
e2“The results indicated that fertilizer supplication was advantageous to pod yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Excessive chemical fertiliser (750 kg/hm2) inhibited vegetative and reproductive growth of peanut to a certain extent.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Material
- Cai- 51e1
- Treatment
- excessive application of chemical fertilizers( 750 kg / hm2)e4
- Outcome
- vegetative and reproductive growthe4
- Direction
- inhibitede4
- Qualifier
- in a certain extente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to peanut cultivar Cai- 51”
e4“The excessive application of chemical fertilizers( 750 kg / hm2) inhibited peanuts' vegetative and reproductive growth in a certain extent,and then affected the pod yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Excessive chemical fertiliser (750 kg/hm2) affected peanut pod yield.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae1
- Material
- Cai- 51e1
- Treatment
- excessive application of chemical fertilizers( 750 kg / hm2)e4
- Outcome
- pod yielde4
- Direction
- affectede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to peanut cultivar Cai- 51”
e4“The excessive application of chemical fertilizers( 750 kg / hm2) inhibited peanuts' vegetative and reproductive growth in a certain extent,and then affected the pod yield”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
200 papers more in this group
See all 204 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.