Abstract
[Objective] A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of different N combination of B with optimized and convention fertilize on yield and quality of cabbage.[Method] There were 5 different treatments without nitrogen,70% optimized nitrogen fertilizer,optimized nitrogen fertilizer,130% optimized nitrogen fertilizer and optimization of nitrogen fertilizer boron deficiency.The experiment was arranged randomly.Meanwhile nitrate vitamin C,soluble sugar and amino acid of the qualities index were determined.[Result] The different treatment could increase the yield of cabbage by 3.86%-12.98% significantly.The highest yield was the treatment of optimize nitrogen fertilizer.Compared with the convention measure,nitrate content of cabbage was decreased by 1.9%-29.7%,the lowest was without nitrogen treatment and the second treatment was optimized fertilizer.It was inconformity for the quality of cabbage by different treatments.The contents of vitamin C was reduced with all the treatments.Only without nitrogen treatments soluble sugar improved 8.4%.The treatment of 130% optimized nitrogen fertilizer and optimization of nitrogen fertilizer boron deficiency enhanced amino acid content by 2.7% and 8.3% of cabbage.The others decreased the content of amino acid differently.[Conclusion] All the treatments could increase the yield of cabbage and decrease the content of amino acid significantly.The change of cabbage nutrition quality was different in fertilization treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments significantly increased cabbage yield by 3.86%-12.98%.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- different treatmente0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.86%-12.98%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The different treatment could increase the yield of cabbage by 3.86%-12.98% significantly.”
Claim · model-written summary
Optimized nitrogen fertilizer gave the highest cabbage yield.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was the treatment of optimize nitrogen fertilizer.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments reduced cabbage nitrate content by 1.9%-29.7% relative to conventional measures.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- optimized fertilizere0
- Outcome
- nitrate contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 1.9%-29.7%e0
- Comparator
- convention measuree0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the convention measure,nitrate content of cabbage was decreased by 1.9%-29.7%,the lowest was without nitrogen treatment and the second treatment was optimized fertilizer.”
Claim · model-written summary
The no-nitrogen treatment had the lowest cabbage nitrate content.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- without nitrogen treatmente0
- Outcome
- nitrate contente0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nitrate content of cabbage was decreased by 1.9%-29.7%,the lowest was without nitrogen treatment and the second treatment was optimized fertilizer.”
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments reduced cabbage vitamin C content.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- all the treatmentse0
- Outcome
- contents of vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The contents of vitamin C was reduced with all the treatments.”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
No-nitrogen treatment increased cabbage soluble sugar by 8.4%.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- without nitrogen treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soluble sugare0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Value
- 8.4%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Only without nitrogen treatments soluble sugar improved 8.4%.”
t0“Cabbage”
Claim · model-written summary
The 130% optimized nitrogen fertilizer treatment increased cabbage amino acid content by 2.7%.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- 130% optimized nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- amino acid contente0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 2.7%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of 130% optimized nitrogen fertilizer and optimization of nitrogen fertilizer boron deficiency enhanced amino acid content by 2.7% and 8.3% of cabbage.”
Claim · model-written summary
The optimized nitrogen fertilizer treatment with boron deficiency increased cabbage amino acid content by 8.3%.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- optimization of nitrogen fertilizer boron deficiencye0
- Outcome
- amino acid contente0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 8.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The treatment of 130% optimized nitrogen fertilizer and optimization of nitrogen fertilizer boron deficiency enhanced amino acid content by 2.7% and 8.3% of cabbage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Other treatments decreased cabbage amino acid content.
- Taxon
- CabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatat0
- Treatment
- The otherse0
- Outcome
- content of amino acide0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The others decreased the content of amino acid differently.”
t0“Cabbage”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →nitrogen · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.
- positive
- positive
- positive
42 papers more in this group
See all 46 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
142 papers more in this group
See all 146 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
444 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
492 papers more in this group
See all 496 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.