Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not affect the macro and microelement content of broccoli leaves, except for N, Mn, Zn and NO3.

A claim from EFFECTS OF INTERCROPPING SYSTEM AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO, YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT OF BROCCOLI · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not affect the macro and microelement content of broccoli leaves, except for N, Mn, Zn and NO3.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione1
Outcome
Macro and microelement contente1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
except for N, Mn, Zn and NO3e1
Setting
field studiese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“To determine effects of intercropping broccoli with onion and their correspondence to different nitrogen concentrations on growth, yield and nutrient contents, field studies were conducted for two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–202
e1

“Macro and microelement content of broccoli leaves was affected neither by cropping systems nor by nitrogen fertilization except for N, Mn, Zn and NO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–986

Title

EFFECTS OF INTERCROPPING SYSTEM AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON LAND EQUIVALENT RATIO, YIELD AND MINERAL CONTENT OF BROCCOLI

Ertan Yildirim; Büsra Cil; Melek Ekinci; et al. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus 2020. doi:10.24326/asphc.2020.3.9

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-61bddfdb549bd4d081365175c3380ae24c83c4c8b0fbffb49df05d539f7a5ff5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.