Paper · 2010 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Cotton Growth and Nitrogen Uptake in Response to Rates of Water and Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation with Saline Water

Xie Xin

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study cotton growth and nitrogen uptake in response to different water and nitrogen application rates under drip irrigation with saline water.Three irrigation water salinity levels were set as 0.35(S1),4.61(S2) and 8.04(S3) dS/m;two water and nitrogen application rates were set as 405(L1),540(L2) mm and 240(N1),360(N2) kg/hm2,respectively.The results showed that plant height of cotton were influenced significantly by water salinity,application rates of water and interaction between them,and the interaction among water salinity,water application rate and nitrogen application rate at earlier growth stage,but mainly affected by water application rate at the later stage.The order of plant height were S2 S1 S3 with water application 540 mm(L2),while no significant difference were found on the growth of plant height between two nitrogen rates.The dry matter accumulation of the cotton stem and leaves are influenced significantly by the intreaction among water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogen application,but cotton bolls and total dry matter accumulation are not significantly influenced by the interaction.Nitrogen uptake of cotton was influenced significantly by water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogen,and interactions between two of them or among the three factors.Total nitrogen content of cotton reduced with water salinity increasing,but increased evidently when water application rate was increased.Those results suggest that higher water application rate can enhance nitrogen uptake of cotton under drip irrigation with saline water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plant height at the earlier stage was significantly influenced by water salinity, water application rate and their interaction.

Treatment
water salinity,application rates of water and interaction between theme0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height of cotton were influenced significantly by water salinity,application rates of water and interaction between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plant height at earlier growth stage was significantly influenced by the interaction among water salinity, water rate and nitrogen rate.

Treatment
the interaction among water salinity,water application rate and nitrogen application ratee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Qualifier
at earlier growth stagee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“the interaction among water salinity,water application rate and nitrogen application rate at earlier growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the later growth stage cotton plant height was mainly affected by water application rate.

Treatment
water application ratee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Qualifier
at the later stagee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–423 · show in text ↑
e1

“but mainly affected by water application rate at the later stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With 540 mm water application, cotton plant height ordered S2 > S1 > S3 across salinity levels.

Treatment
water application 540 mm(L2)e0
Outcome
order of plant heighte0
Direction
S2 S1 S3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The order of plant height were S2 S1 S3 with water application 540 mm(L2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant difference in cotton plant height growth was found between the two nitrogen rates.

Treatment
nitrogen ratese0
Outcome
growth of plant heighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
two nitrogen ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference were found on the growth of plant height between two nitrogen rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accumulation of cotton stem and leaves was significantly influenced by the interaction of water salinity, water rate and nitrogen rate.

Treatment
water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation of the cotton stem and leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter accumulation of the cotton stem and leaves are influenced significantly by the intreaction among water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1063 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton boll and total dry matter accumulation were not significantly influenced by the interaction.

Treatment
the interactione0
Outcome
cotton bolls and total dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but cotton bolls and total dry matter accumulation are not significantly influenced by the interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton nitrogen uptake was significantly influenced by water salinity, water rate, nitrogen rate and their interactions.

Treatment
water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogene0
Outcome
Nitrogen uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen uptake of cotton was influenced significantly by water salinity,application rates of water and nitrogen,and interactions between two of them or among the three factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen content of cotton decreased as water salinity increased.

Treatment
water salinity increasinge0
Outcome
Total nitrogen contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total nitrogen content of cotton reduced with water salinity increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen content of cotton increased evidently when water application rate was increased.

Treatment
water application ratee1
Outcome
Total nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total nitrogen content of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1376 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased evidently when water application rate was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest a higher water application rate can enhance cotton nitrogen uptake under drip irrigation with saline water.

Treatment
higher water application ratee0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
enhancee0
Setting
drip irrigation with saline watere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher water application rate can enhance nitrogen uptake of cotton under drip irrigation with saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1616 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 5 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    N deficiency significantly reduced total dry weight of cotton by 7% at 76 DAP.

    Canopy development and photosynthesis of cotton as influenced by nitrogen nutrition · 1990 · compared with N‐sufficient plants

    No difference from an alternativeAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.