Paper · 2012 · Fujian linxueyuan xuebao

Key factors influencing rooting of stem cuttings and dynamics of rooting related oxidases of Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa

Huang Jian-hua

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of growing media,cutting types and exogenous auxins on rooting ability of stem cuttings of Camellia meiocarpa and C.oleifera were studied.The dynamic changes of activities of peroxidase(POD),polyphenol oxidase(PPO) and indoleacetic acid oxidase(IAAO) during rooting process were also investigated.The results showed that growing media,cutting types and exogenous auxins had obvious effects on rooting ability and root development of C.meiocarpa and C.oleifera cuttings.Different rooting rates and root development were caused by different growing media,and the mixed media of 75% red soil+25% river sand led to the highest rooting rate(92.6%-93.7%),but the roots were underdeveloped.While the 100% perlite medium had the best rooting development and lower rooting rate(64.2%-66.8%).The cuttings without leaves didn′t root at all,the cutting with half leaves rooted in higher rate than that with complete leaves rooted.Concerning the rate to rooting,top cutting and soft-branch were better than non-top and hard-branch.Compared to No.6 ABT,IBA and NAA,No.3 ABT was the best exogenous auxin,with appropriate concentration of 100 mg · L-1.After cutting,the POD,PPO and IAAO activities changed in the cuttings of C.meiocarpa during rooting process regularly.POD activities showed double peak curve of rise,fall,rise sharply and down,while PPO and IAAO activities showed single-peak curve of rise-down.Compared to the control,the peak of curve of the 3 oxidases obviously increased and appeared ahead.It was concluded that No.3 ABT directly affected the rooting ability of C.meiocarpa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed red soil and river sand gave the highest rooting rate of 92.6%-93.7%.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
75% red soil+25% river sande0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
92.6%-93.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mixed media of 75% red soil+25% river sand led to the highest rooting rate(92.6%-93.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots in mixed medium were underdeveloped.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
underdevelopede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the roots were underdeveloped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perlite gave best root development but a lower rooting rate of 64.2%-66.8%.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
100% perlite mediume0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
64.2%-66.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 100% perlite medium had the best rooting development and lower rooting rate(64.2%-66.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cuttings without leaves did not root.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
without leavese0
Outcome
didn′t root at alle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cuttings without leaves didn′t root at all”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half-leaf cuttings rooted at a higher rate than complete-leaf cuttings.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
half leavese0
Outcome
rootede0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
complete leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cutting with half leaves rooted in higher rate than that with complete leaves rooted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Top and soft-branch cuttings rooted better than non-top and hard-branch cuttings.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
top cutting and soft-branche0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
non-top and hard-branche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“top cutting and soft-branch were better than non-top and hard-branch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No.3 ABT was the best auxin at 100 mg · L-1.

Taxon
Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpaCamellia oleiferaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
No.3 ABTe0
Outcome
best exogenous auxine0
Direction
beste0
Value
100 mg · L-1e0
Comparator
No.6 ABT,IBA and NAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to No.6 ABT,IBA and NAA,No.3 ABT was the best exogenous auxin,with appropriate concentration of 100 mg · L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera and C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD showed a double-peaked activity curve.

Taxon
C.meiocarpaCamellia meiocarpat0
Gene
PODe0
Outcome
POD activitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“POD activities showed double peak curve of rise,fall,rise sharply and down”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO and IAAO activities showed single-peak curves.

Taxon
C.meiocarpaCamellia meiocarpat0
Outcome
PPO and IAAO activitiese0

Verbatim

e0

“PPO and IAAO activities showed single-peak curve of rise-down”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three oxidase peaks increased and appeared earlier than control.

Taxon
C.meiocarpaCamellia meiocarpat0
Treatment
No.3 ABTe1
Outcome
peak of curve of the 3 oxidasese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control,the peak of curve of the 3 oxidases obviously increased and appeared ahead”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“C.meiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“No.3 ABT was the best exogenous auxin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1096 · show in text ↑

growing medium · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.