Paper · 2012 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Sucrose on Root Growth and Morphological Change in Common Wheat

Shuo Zhang

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The research aimed to study the effects of sucrose on the growth and the morphology of the wheat roots.[Method] Seeds of wheat were treated with different concentrations of sucrose(0,5,10,20,30 and 50 g/L) and cultured in darkness for 2 days.[Result] Comparing to the control,wheat roots treated by sucrose were thicker,harder and milky white.The root-tips were red and the color was deeper with the increase of sucrose concentration.After the treatment with the different concentrations of sucrose,the average root length of wheat significantly reduced compared to the control.[Conclusion] Sucrose had inhibitory effects on roots growth of wheat and the morphology.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose-treated wheat roots were thicker and harder than control roots.

Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
thickere0
Qualifier
hardere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing to the control,wheat roots treated by sucrose were thicker,harder and milky white.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose-treated wheat roots were milky white compared with controls.

Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
milky whitee0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing to the control,wheat roots treated by sucrose were thicker,harder and milky white.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–355 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root tips became red, with deeper coloration at higher sucrose concentrations.

Taxon
Common WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
root-tipse0
Treatment
sucrose concentratione0
Outcome
the colore0
Direction
deepere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“The root-tips were red and the color was deeper with the increase of sucrose concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose treatments significantly reduced average wheat root length compared with the control.

Treatment
different concentrations of sucrosee0
Outcome
average root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After the treatment with the different concentrations of sucrose,the average root length of wheat significantly reduced compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–590 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.