Abstract
An investigation was undertaken to ascertain the effect of soil amendments with oil cakes of castor and neem and leaves of castor, Persian lilac/bakain and neem, alone and in combination, on Meloidogyne incognita, plant growth and chlorophyll content of okra and lentil and Rhizobium root nodulation of lentil. In general, all treatments significantly reduced root galling and improved plant growth and chlorophyll content, except when treatment was with castor leaf alone. Performance was improved when the amendments were combined. Neem cakes combined with the other soil amendments gave the best nematode control and plant growth. All treatments increased root nodulation of lentil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments with oil cakes and leaves significantly reduced root galling caused by Meloidogyne incognita on okra and lentil.
- Taxon
- okra and lentil
Lens culinaris.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- soil amendments with oil cakese0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae2pest - Outcome
- root gallinge1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e0“soil amendments with oil cakes of castor and neem”
e1“In general, all treatments significantly reduced root galling”
e2“on Meloidogyne incognita, plant growth and chlorophyll content of okra and lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil amendments with oil cakes and leaves improved plant growth and chlorophyll content of okra and lentil.
- Taxon
- okra and lentilLens culinarisAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- soil amendments with oil cakese0
- Outcome
- plant growth and chlorophyll contente1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e0“soil amendments with oil cakes of castor and neem”
e1“all treatments significantly reduced root galling and improved plant growth and chlorophyll content”
Claim · model-written summary
Castor leaf alone was the exception to the general reduction in root galling and improvement in plant growth.
- Taxon
- okra and lentilLens culinarisAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- castor leaf alonee2
- Outcome
- root gallinge1
- Qualifier
- except when treatment was with castor leaf alonee2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e2“except when treatment was with castor leaf alone”
e1“all treatments significantly reduced root galling and improved plant growth and chlorophyll content”
Claim · model-written summary
Performance was improved when the soil amendments were combined.
- Taxon
- okra and lentilLens culinarisAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- amendments were combinede2
- Outcome
- Performancee2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e2“Performance was improved when the amendments were combined”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem cakes combined with the other soil amendments gave the best nematode control and plant growth.
- Taxon
- okra and lentilLens culinarisAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Neem cakes combined with the other soil amendmentse3
- Outcome
- nematode control and plant growthe3
- Direction
- beste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e3“Neem cakes combined with the other soil amendments gave the best nematode control and plant growth”
Claim · model-written summary
All soil amendment treatments increased root nodulation of lentil by Rhizobium.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarise4
- Treatment
- soil amendmentse0
- Outcome
- root nodulatione4
- Direction
- increasede4
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“okra and lentil”
e0“soil amendments with oil cakes of castor and neem”
e4“All treatments increased root nodulation of lentil”
e5“Rhizobium root nodulation of lentil”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · physiology: pigments · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
botanical · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →other · control · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
botanical · control · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
other · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
other · physiology: pigments · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
other · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
botanical · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.