Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengal. The study was aimed to evaluate about the effect of different combinations of organic nutrient sources and bio mulches on growth, physiology and yield of okra (cv. Arka Anamika) in the year 2017 and 2018. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. There were two factors of the experiment such as factor N- Organic nutrient sources and factor M – Bio-mulches, each having four levels. The different levels were under factor N were (N1 –Farmyard manure (25 t/ha) + Azophos biofertiliser +Humic Acid; N2 –Farmyard manure (25 t/ha) + Azophos biofertiliser + Seaweed extract; N3–Vermicompost (5 t/ha) + Azophos biofertiliser + Humic acid; N4 - Vermicompost (5 t/ha) + Azophos biofertiliser +Seaweed extract) and under factor M (M1 - Rice Straw; M2- Dry water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes); M3- Dry local weed (Polygonum persicaria); M4- Dry vegetable legume plant residues) which in total comprises of 16 treatment and combinations. Random samples were collected and analysed at various growth phases. The results of the experiment revealed that application of biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2ml/lit at 30, 40 and 50 days after sowing along with dry vegetable legume plant residue (N4M4) exhibited maximum height (65.85 cm at 60 DAS), leaf chlorophyll content (41.91 SPAD value), total yield per hectare (16.65 t/ hectare) in pooled. However there was significant effect of different treatment combinations in growth, yield and physiological attributes of okra.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost with biofertiliser, three foliar sprays of seaweed extract and dry legume residue (N4M4) gave the maximum okra height (65.85 cm at 60 DAS).
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse3 - Material
- Arka Anamikae3
- Treatment
- biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extracte1
- Outcome
- heighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 65.85 cm at 60 DASe2
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse4
- Setting
- Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengale5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“application of biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2ml/lit at 30, 40 and 50 days after sowing along with dry vegetable legume plant residue (N4M4)”
e2“exhibited maximum height (65.85 cm at 60 DAS)”
e3“yield of okra (cv. Arka Anamika)”
e4“there was significant effect of different treatment combinations in growth, yield and physiological attributes of okra”
e5“Field experiments were conducted at Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengal”
Claim · model-written summary
The same N4M4 treatment gave higher leaf chlorophyll content (41.91 SPAD value) than the other treatment combinations.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Material
- Arka Anamikae3
- Treatment
- biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extracte1
- Outcome
- leaf chlorophyll contente6
- Direction
- higherinferrede6
- Value
- 41.91 SPAD valuee6
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse4
- Setting
- Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengale5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2ml/lit at 30, 40 and 50 days after sowing along with dry vegetable legume plant residue (N4M4)”
e3“yield of okra (cv. Arka Anamika)”
e4“there was significant effect of different treatment combinations in growth, yield and physiological attributes of okra”
e6“leaf chlorophyll content (41.91 SPAD value)”
e5“Field experiments were conducted at Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengal”
Claim · model-written summary
The same N4M4 treatment gave higher total yield per hectare (16.65 t/ hectare) than the other treatment combinations, in pooled data.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Material
- Arka Anamikae3
- Treatment
- biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extracte1
- Outcome
- total yield per hectaree7
- Direction
- higherinferrede7
- Value
- 16.65 t/ hectaree7
- Qualifier
- in poolede7
- Comparator
- different treatment combinationse4
- Setting
- Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengale5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of biofertiliser enriched vermicompost with three time foliar spray of seaweed extract @ 2ml/lit at 30, 40 and 50 days after sowing along with dry vegetable legume plant residue (N4M4)”
e3“yield of okra (cv. Arka Anamika)”
e4“there was significant effect of different treatment combinations in growth, yield and physiological attributes of okra”
e7“total yield per hectare (16.65 t/ hectare) in pooled”
e5“Field experiments were conducted at Instructional farm of Department of Vegetable Science, UBK, West Bengal”
Claim · model-written summary
Different treatment combinations of organic nutrient sources and bio-mulches had a significant effect on okra growth, yield and physiological attributes.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse3
- Treatment
- different treatment combinationse4
- Outcome
- growth, yield and physiological attributese4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“yield of okra (cv. Arka Anamika)”
e4“there was significant effect of different treatment combinations in growth, yield and physiological attributes of okra”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →other · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →inoculation · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →inoculation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
111 papers more in this group
See all 115 papers →fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
203 papers more in this group
See all 207 papers →fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.