Abstract
【Objective】This experiment studied the effects of light quality provided by light filter films and shading on berry quality in Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe'.【Method】The experimental materials were the fruit of‘Red Globe'at veraison,which were bagged by various polyethylene film bags(red,orange,green,blue and white) and silver paper(shading treatment). Quality characteristics of berry,such as the berry weight,sugar and acid accumulation,berry coloring and anthocyanin synthesis from veraison to maturation stage,were measured and analyzed.【Results】The results showed that the soluble solids,total sugar content and sugar-acid ratio of berry bagged with the blue filter film were increased. Compared with the white film control,glucose,fructose and sucrose content of berry bagged with blue film were increased by 7.2%,13.7%,and 17.2%,respectively. Additionally,the anthocyanin was enhanced significantly by blue light filter film and the hue angle(h) showed the minimum value at maturity. Significant differences in main composition of anthocyanin were observed in berries of different light filter film bagging treatment. At maturation,compared with the white film,cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and peonidin-3-O-glucoside content of berry with blue film were increased by 18.4% and 12.5% respectively. The activity of PAL was induced significantly under blue light filter film,which might increase anthocyanin accumula-tion. But the sugaracid ratio of berry by shading was the minimum value and anthocyanin synthesis was suppressed.【Conclusion】The research confirmed the importance of light environment around fruit for quality of V. vinifera L. in hot and humid regions of southern China. It also suggested that blue light filter film might improve the berry quality by regulating distribution of photosynthetic product and increasing anthocyanin accumulation resulted from the increase of PAL activity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased berry soluble solids, total sugar and sugar-acid ratio.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.
Vitis viniferae2 - Material
- Red Globee2
- Treatment
- blue filter filme0
- Outcome
- soluble solids,total sugar content and sugar-acid ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- white film controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soluble solids,total sugar content and sugar-acid ratio of berry bagged with the blue filter film were increased”
e1“Compared with the white film control”
e2“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased berry glucose by 7.2% relative to white film.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue filme0
- Outcome
- glucosee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.2%e0
- Comparator
- white film controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the white film control,glucose,fructose and sucrose content of berry bagged with blue film were increased by 7.2%,13.7%,and 17.2%,respectively”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased berry fructose by 13.7% relative to white film.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue filme0
- Outcome
- fructosee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 13.7%e0
- Comparator
- white film controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the white film control,glucose,fructose and sucrose content of berry bagged with blue film were increased by 7.2%,13.7%,and 17.2%,respectively”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased berry sucrose by 17.2% relative to white film.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue filme0
- Outcome
- sucrose contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.2%e0
- Comparator
- white film controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the white film control,glucose,fructose and sucrose content of berry bagged with blue film were increased by 7.2%,13.7%,and 17.2%,respectively”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film significantly enhanced anthocyanin and minimized hue angle at maturity.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue light filter filme0
- Outcome
- anthocyanine0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“anthocyanin was enhanced significantly by blue light filter film and the hue angle(h) showed the minimum value at maturity”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Hue angle reached its minimum at maturity under blue film.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
- Treatment
- blue light filter filme1
- Outcome
- hue angle(h)e0
- Direction
- minimume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hue angle(h) showed the minimum value at maturity”
e1“by blue light filter film”
e2“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Anthocyanin composition differed significantly among filter-film bagging treatments.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- different light filter film bagging treatmente0
- Outcome
- main composition of anthocyanine0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant differences in main composition of anthocyanin were observed in berries of different light filter film bagging treatment”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased cyanidin-3-O-glucoside by 18.4% at maturation.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue filme0
- Outcome
- cyanidin-3-O-glucosidee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.4%e0
- Comparator
- white filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At maturation,compared with the white film,cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and peonidin-3-O-glucoside content of berry with blue film were increased by 18.4% and 12.5% respectively”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film increased peonidin-3-O-glucoside by 12.5% at maturation.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue filme0
- Outcome
- peonidin-3-O-glucoside contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 12.5%e0
- Comparator
- white filme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At maturation,compared with the white film,cyanidin-3-O-glucoside and peonidin-3-O-glucoside content of berry with blue film were increased by 18.4% and 12.5% respectively”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue film significantly induced PAL activity.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue light filter filme0
- Gene
- PALe0
- Outcome
- activity of PALe0
- Direction
- inducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“activity of PAL was induced significantly under blue light filter film”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors propose PAL activity may increase anthocyanin accumulation.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Gene
- PALe0
- Outcome
- anthocyanin accumula-tione0
- Qualifier
- mighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“activity of PAL was induced significantly under blue light filter film,which might increase anthocyanin accumula-tion”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading produced the minimum berry sugar-acid ratio.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- sugaracid ratioe0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sugaracid ratio of berry by shading was the minimum value”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading suppressed anthocyanin synthesis.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae2
- Treatment
- shadinge1
- Outcome
- anthocyanin synthesise0
- Direction
- suppressede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“anthocyanin synthesis was suppressed”
e1“by shading”
e2“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest blue film may improve berry quality through photosynthate distribution and anthocyanin accumulation associated with PAL activity.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
- Treatment
- blue light filter filme0
- Gene
- PALe0
- Outcome
- berry qualitye0
- Qualifier
- regulating distribution of photosynthetic product and increasing anthocyanin accumulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“blue light filter film might improve the berry quality by regulating distribution of photosynthetic product and increasing anthocyanin accumulation resulted from the increase of PAL activity”
e1“Vitis vinifera L.‘Red Globe”
The same questions in other papers
shade · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →light · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.