Paper · 2002 · JOURNAL OF HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY

Technique of Weed-Control and Quick Clear-Stubble by Spraying Herbicide Paraquat in Different States of Paddy Field

Qiyuan Tang

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To ascertain the effects of paraquat on quick clearing weeds and stubble in different states of paddy field,the experiments of the chemical amount, water adding, weather, synergist and stubble height were conducted in Ninxiang county,Hunan province in 2000. The results show that the effective amount of paraquat is about 3.75 L /hm 2.The water adding has great influence on weed and stubble control. Agroxone, acetochlor,ammonium bicarbonate and potassium chloride can enhance the effects of paraquat at different degrees. Stubble heights affect the hill ratio and plant numbers of ratooning. It is recommended that the application amount of paraquat is 3.00~3.75 L/hm 2 in winter-socked field ,3.75~4.50 L/hm 2 in winter-dry field in early rice, and 3.75 L/hm 2 in no-tilled field in late rice with 45 kg/hm 2 ammonium bicarbonate and 450 mL/hm 2 acetochlor as synergist and 900 kg/hm 2 water.The spray should be conducted at duskor early morning. Meanwhile the stubble height should not be higher than 4 cm. After weeds get withered,it is necessary to flood the weeds and stubbles to prevent then from regenerating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective amount of paraquat for quick clearing of weeds and stubble in paddy fields was about 3.75 L/hm2.

Treatment
paraquate0
Outcome
effective amount of paraquate0
Value
3.75 L /hm 2e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the effective amount of paraquat is about 3.75 L /hm 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water adding had a great influence on weed and stubble control.

Taxon
weede0
Treatment
water addinge0
Outcome
weed and stubble controle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The water adding has great influence on weed and stubble control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agroxone, acetochlor and ammonium bicarbonate enhanced the effects of paraquat to different degrees.

Treatment
Agroxone, acetochlor,ammonium bicarbonatee0
Outcome
effects of paraquate0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Agroxone, acetochlor,ammonium bicarbonate and potassium chloride can enhance the effects of paraquat at different degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium chloride enhanced the effects of paraquat to a degree.

Treatment
potassium chloridee0
Outcome
effects of paraquate0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Agroxone, acetochlor,ammonium bicarbonate and potassium chloride can enhance the effects of paraquat at different degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble height affected the hill ratio and plant numbers of ratooning.

Treatment
Stubble heightse0
Outcome
hill ratio and plant numbers of ratooninge0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Stubble heights affect the hill ratio and plant numbers of ratooning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–592 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended paraquat application amount in winter-soaked field is 3.00-3.75 L/hm2.

Outcome
application amount of paraquate0
Value
3.00~3.75 L/hm 2e0
Setting
winter-socked fielde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the application amount of paraquat is 3.00~3.75 L/hm 2 in winter-socked field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–694 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended paraquat application amount in winter-dry field in early rice is 3.75-4.50 L/hm2.

Outcome
3.75~4.50 L/hm 2e0
Value
3.75~4.50 L/hm 2e0
Setting
winter-dry fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3.75~4.50 L/hm 2 in winter-dry field in early rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–746 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended paraquat application amount in no-tilled field in late rice is 3.75 L/hm2 with 45 kg/hm2 ammonium bicarbonate, 450 mL/hm2 acetochlor as synergist and 900 kg/hm2 water.

Outcome
3.75 L/hm 2e0
Value
3.75 L/hm 2e0
Qualifier
45 kg/hm 2 ammonium bicarbonate and 450 mL/hm 2 acetochlor as synergist and 900 kg/hm 2 watere0
Setting
no-tilled fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3.75 L/hm 2 in no-tilled field in late rice with 45 kg/hm 2 ammonium bicarbonate and 450 mL/hm 2 acetochlor as synergist and 900 kg/hm 2 water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–894 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend spraying at dusk or early morning.

Outcome
conducted at duskor early morninge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The spray should be conducted at duskor early morning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–948 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that the stubble height should not be higher than 4 cm.

Outcome
stubble heighte0
Value
4 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the stubble height should not be higher than 4 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1009 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend flooding the weeds and stubbles after the weeds wither to prevent regeneration.

Taxon
weedse0
Outcome
flood the weeds and stubblese0

Verbatim

e0

“it is necessary to flood the weeds and stubbles to prevent then from regenerating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1117 · show in text ↑

hydrogencarbonate · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium chloride · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 86 positive, 35 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.