Paper · 2008 · China Forestry Science and Technology

A Preliminary Study on Isolation,Identification and Pathogenicity of the Bacterium Accompanying Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Feng ZhiXin

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two bacterium isolates were isolated from the body of pine wood nematode(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus):strain GD1 and R,and GD1 was identified as the species Bacillus firmus.The one or two-yearold solution cultured excised branches of Pinus massoniana were inoculated with disinfected Bursaphelenchus xylophilus(Bx),GD1,R,Bx+GD1 and Bx+R,respectively.The results showed that by inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmus,the branches were diseased,the oleoresin exudation of the branches decreased or ceased,and the transpiration of the branches reduced,while by inoculation with Bx or B.firmus singly,the branches were not diseased.Stain R had no effect on the occurrence of pine wood nematode disease.Therefore,it was proposed that the pine wood nematode and its accompanying bacterium were both necessary pathogenic factors of the pine wilt diseases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GD1 isolated from pine wood nematodes was identified as Bacillus firmus.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Interactor
Bacillus firmusCytobacillus firmuse0pathogen
Outcome
GD1 was identified as the species Bacillus firmuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cytobacillus firmus
Cytobacillus firmus · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two bacterium isolates were isolated from the body of pine wood nematode(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus):strain GD1 and R,and GD1 was identified as the species Bacillus firmus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nematode and B. firmus inoculation caused branch disease.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmuse0
Interactor
Bxe0pathogen
Second interactor
B.firmusCytobacillus firmuse0pathogen
Outcome
branches were diseasede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cytobacillus firmus
Cytobacillus firmus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmus,the branches were diseased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nematode and B. firmus inoculation decreased or stopped oleoresin exudation.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmuse0
Interactor
Bxe0pathogen
Second interactor
B.firmusCytobacillus firmuse0pathogen
Outcome
oleoresin exudation of the branchese0
Direction
decreased or ceasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cytobacillus firmus
Cytobacillus firmus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmus,the branches were diseased,the oleoresin exudation of the branches decreased or ceased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nematode and B. firmus inoculation reduced branch transpiration.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmuse0
Interactor
Bxe0pathogen
Second interactor
B.firmusCytobacillus firmuse0pathogen
Outcome
transpiration of the branchese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cytobacillus firmus
Cytobacillus firmus · Second interactorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by inoculation with the mixture of Bx and B.firmus,the branches were diseased,the oleoresin exudation of the branches decreased or ceased,and the transpiration of the branches reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branches inoculated with nematodes alone were not diseased.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
inoculation with Bxe0
Interactor
Bxe0pathogen
Outcome
branches were not diseasede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by inoculation with Bx or B.firmus singly,the branches were not diseased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branches inoculated with B. firmus alone were not diseased.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
inoculation with Bx or B.firmus singlye0
Interactor
B.firmusCytobacillus firmuse0pathogen
Outcome
branches were not diseasede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cytobacillus firmus
Cytobacillus firmus · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by inoculation with Bx or B.firmus singly,the branches were not diseased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain R had no effect on pine wood nematode disease occurrence.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Treatment
Stain Re0
Interactor
pine wood nematodeBursaphelenchus xylophiluse0pathogen
Outcome
occurrence of pine wood nematode diseasee0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus · InteractorA. Steven Munson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stain R had no effect on the occurrence of pine wood nematode disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed that nematodes and accompanying bacteria were both necessary for pine wilt disease.

Taxon
Pinus massonianaPinus massonianat0
Interactor
pine wood nematodeBursaphelenchus xylophiluse0pathogen
Second interactor
accompanying bacteriume0pathogen
Outcome
pine wilt diseasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus massoniana
Pinus massoniana · TaxonDoctoroftcm · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus · InteractorA. Steven Munson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pine wood nematode and its accompanying bacterium were both necessary pathogenic factors of the pine wilt diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus massoniana were inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–265 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Pinus massoniana (Chinese red pine)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · physiology: gas exchange · Pinus massoniana (Chinese red pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.