Paper · 2005 · Guangxi Agricultural Science

Effects of different fertilizations and planting densities on yield and quality of high-oil maize variety115

Jianming Wu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Considering of economical output and commodity in production of highoil maize, fertilization and planting density in different levels were tested in culture of the maize variety 115. The results showed that while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low, which is adapted to the planting density and fertilization level at the local condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the specified planting density and fertilization, grain yield was highest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the specified planting density and fertilization, oil content was highest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
percentage of oil contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the specified planting density and fertilization, protein content was highest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the specified planting density and fertilization, aminoacid content was highest.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
aminoacid contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the specified planting density and fertilization, starch content was low.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2e0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the planting density was 52500/hm 2, and the fertilization was N 360kg/hm 2, P 2O 5120kg/hm 2 and K 2O 180 kg/hm 2, the comprehensive trait of the variety, including the grain yield, the percentage of oil content, the protein content and the aminoacid content was the highest; and the starch content was quite low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

density · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 6 positive, 11 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

density · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 19 positive, 14 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 197 positive, 49 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

density · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.