Abstract
The experiment in pot was carried out with Shanyou 63( indica type hybrid rice) and Wuyujing 3( japanica ). Effects of N-fertilizer application after transplantation on the main quality characters and RVA profile parameters of rice were studied. The results were as follow: effects of N-fertilizer on head milled rice and protein content were improved with the application increase; effect of N-fertilizer on chalkniss varied in different cultivars; gel consistency became softer with the amount increasing of N-fertilizer; alkali spreading value and amylose content were insensitive to the fertilizer. Effects of N-fertilizer on RVA profile parameters varied significantly in two cultivars. There was a conic relationship between peak viscosity and amount of N-fertilizer. Comparing with Wuyujing 3, Shanyou 63 needed less N-fertilizer to reach the tiptop of the peak viscosity. Furthermore, effect of N-fertilizer on breakdown in Shanyou 63 was more obvious than that in Wuyujing 3.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N fertilizer improved head milled rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- head milled ricee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of N-fertilizer on head milled rice and protein content were improved with the application increase”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N fertilizer improved protein content.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of N-fertilizer on head milled rice and protein content were improved with the application increase”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizer effect on chalkiness varied by cultivar.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- chalknisse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of N-fertilizer on chalkniss varied in different cultivars”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Gel consistency softened with increasing N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- gel consistencye0
- Direction
- softere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gel consistency became softer with the amount increasing of N-fertilizer”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Alkali spreading value was insensitive to N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- fertilizere0
- Outcome
- alkali spreading valuee0
- Direction
- insensitivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“alkali spreading value and amylose content were insensitive to the fertilizer”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Amylose content was insensitive to N fertilizer.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- fertilizere0
- Outcome
- amylose contente0
- Direction
- insensitivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“alkali spreading value and amylose content were insensitive to the fertilizer”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
N fertilizer effects on RVA profiles differed significantly between cultivars.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- RVA profile parameterse0
- Comparator
- two cultivarse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Effects of N-fertilizer on RVA profile parameters varied significantly in two cultivars.”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Peak viscosity followed a conic relationship with N fertilizer amount.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- N-fertilizere0
- Outcome
- peak viscositye0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was a conic relationship between peak viscosity and amount of N-fertilizer.”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Shanyou 63 required less N than Wuyujing 3 to reach peak viscosity maximum.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- Shanyou 63e0
- Outcome
- N-fertilizer to reach the tiptop of the peak viscositye0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- Wuyujing 3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Comparing with Wuyujing 3, Shanyou 63 needed less N-fertilizer to reach the tiptop of the peak viscosity.”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The N fertilizer effect on breakdown was more evident in Shanyou 63 than Wuyujing 3.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Material
- Shanyou 63e0
- Outcome
- breakdowne0
- Direction
- more obviouse0
- Comparator
- Wuyujing 3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effect of N-fertilizer on breakdown in Shanyou 63 was more obvious than that in Wuyujing 3.”
t0“rice”
t1“rice”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →nitrogen · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.