Abstract
The effects of combined application of Zinc (Zn),Iron(Fe),and Molybdenum(Mo) fertilizers on the forage yield and quality of alfalfa were studied by the field experiment.The results indicate that microelement fertilizers could remarkably increased the 1st cut forage yield of alfalfa by 18.1% when the application amounts were Zn 5 kg· hm-2,Fe 7.5 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.45 kg· hm-2.But there were no significant effect on the yields of 2nd,3rd,and 4th cut.Among the three microelements,Zn fertilizer had significant effect to increase forage yield,but Fe and Mo fertilizer not.Reasonable combined application of microelement fertilizers significantly increased the feeding value of alfalfa,i.e.higher contents of crude protein(CP),crude fat(EE) and Ca,and lower content of crude fiber(CF),when the applied amounts were Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2.All of the three microelement fertilizers could increase the quality of alfalfa;the effect of Zn fertilizer was considerable,but those of Fe and Mo fertilizer insignificant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Combined Zn, Fe and Mo at stated rates increased first-cut alfalfa forage yield by 18.1%.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- Zn 5 kg· hm-2,Fe 7.5 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.45 kg· hm-2e0
- Outcome
- 1st cut forage yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“microelement fertilizers could remarkably increased the 1st cut forage yield of alfalfa by 18.1% when the application amounts were Zn 5 kg· hm-2,Fe 7.5 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.45 kg· hm-2”
Claim · model-written summary
The fertilizers had no significant effect on second, third or fourth cut alfalfa yield.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- yields of 2nd,3rd,and 4th cute0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there were no significant effect on the yields of 2nd,3rd,and 4th cut”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer significantly increased alfalfa forage yield.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Zn fertilizere0
- Outcome
- forage yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zn fertilizer had significant effect to increase forage yield”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe fertilizer did not significantly affect alfalfa forage yield.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Fee0
- Outcome
- forage yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zn fertilizer had significant effect to increase forage yield,but Fe and Mo fertilizer not”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo fertilizer did not significantly affect alfalfa forage yield.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Moe0
- Outcome
- forage yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zn fertilizer had significant effect to increase forage yield,but Fe and Mo fertilizer not”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrients at stated rates increased alfalfa crude protein content.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2e0
- Outcome
- crude protein(CP)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of crude protein(CP),crude fat(EE) and Ca,and lower content of crude fiber(CF),when the applied amounts were Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrients at stated rates increased alfalfa crude fat content.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2e0
- Outcome
- crude fat(EE)e0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of crude protein(CP),crude fat(EE) and Ca,and lower content of crude fiber(CF),when the applied amounts were Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrients at stated rates increased alfalfa Ca content.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2e0
- Outcome
- Cae0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of crude protein(CP),crude fat(EE) and Ca,and lower content of crude fiber(CF),when the applied amounts were Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined micronutrients at stated rates lowered alfalfa crude fiber content.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Treatment
- Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2e0
- Outcome
- crude fiber(CF)e0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher contents of crude protein(CP),crude fat(EE) and Ca,and lower content of crude fiber(CF),when the applied amounts were Zn 10 kg· hm-2,Fe 15 kg· hm-2,and Mo 0.225 kg· hm-2”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer had a considerable quality effect on alfalfa.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- effect of Zn fertilizere0
- Direction
- considerablee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the effect of Zn fertilizer was considerable”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Fe fertilizer had an insignificant quality effect on alfalfa.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- Fee0
- Direction
- insignificante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“those of Fe and Mo fertilizer insignificant”
t0“Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Mo fertilizer had an insignificant quality effect on alfalfa.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Outcome
- Moe0
- Direction
- insignificante0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“those of Fe and Mo fertilizer insignificant”
t0“Alfalfa”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
molybdenum atom · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →zinc atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →molybdenum atom · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →zinc atom · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
molybdenum atom · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
iron atom · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →zinc atom · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.