Paper · 2009 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of P and Zn Combination on the Growth,Yield and Kernel Nitrogen Content of Wheat

Yin En

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective]The research aimed to discuss the influence mechanism of P and Zn on the growth of wheat.[Method] Pot experiment was used to study the effects of P and Zn combination on the growth,yield and kernel nitrogen content of wheat in lime concretion black soils.[Result]In seedling stage and earing time of wheat,P and Zn showed synergic relationship.In mature period P and Zn showed rivalry relationship.Suitable P and Zn allocated proportion was advantageous to the wheat grain output enhancement and economic efficiency increase.The processing of P0.3Zn0.2 output was highest,achieved the 0.05 level difference.The processing of P0.3Zn0.4,P0.9 Zn0.2 and P0.9 Zn0.4 volume variance was not remarkable,the processing of Zn0 output was lowest.[Conclusion]Under the environment of low P concentration in soil,Zn application could promote the growth of wheat root system.Under the environment of high P concentration,suitable Zn application could promote the growth of wheat root system,while too much Zn application could induce the rivalry of P and Zn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and Zn showed a synergic relationship at seedling stage and earing time.

Organ / stage
seedling stage and earing timee0
Outcome
P and Zn showed synergic relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In seedling stage and earing time of wheat,P and Zn showed synergic relationship.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 274–355 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and Zn showed a rivalry relationship at maturity.

Organ / stage
mature periode0
Outcome
P and Zn showed rivalry relationshipe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In mature period P and Zn showed rivalry relationship.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A suitable P and Zn ratio enhanced wheat grain output.

Treatment
Suitable P and Zn allocated proportione0
Outcome
grain outpute0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Suitable P and Zn allocated proportion was advantageous to the wheat grain output enhancement and economic efficiency increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A suitable P and Zn ratio increased economic efficiency.

Treatment
Suitable P and Zn allocated proportione0
Outcome
economic efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Suitable P and Zn allocated proportion was advantageous to the wheat grain output enhancement and economic efficiency increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P0.3Zn0.2 had the highest output at the 0.05 significance level.

Treatment
P0.3Zn0.2e0
Outcome
outpute0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The processing of P0.3Zn0.2 output was highest,achieved the 0.05 level difference.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–618 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Output differences among the listed P and Zn treatments were not remarkable.

Outcome
volume variance was not remarkablee0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The processing of P0.3Zn0.4,P0.9 Zn0.2 and P0.9 Zn0.4 volume variance was not remarkable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn0 had the lowest output.

Treatment
Zn0e0
Outcome
outpute0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the processing of Zn0 output was lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn application promoted wheat root growth under low soil P.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
growth of wheat root systeme0
Direction
promotee0
Qualifier
low P concentration in soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the environment of low P concentration in soil,Zn application could promote the growth of wheat root system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suitable Zn application promoted wheat root growth under high soil P.

Treatment
suitable Zn applicatione0
Outcome
growth of wheat root systeme0
Direction
promotee0
Qualifier
high P concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the environment of high P concentration,suitable Zn application could promote the growth of wheat root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess Zn under high P induced P–Zn rivalry.

Treatment
too much Zn applicatione0
Outcome
rivalry of P and Zne0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“while too much Zn application could induce the rivalry of P and Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1056 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 347 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.