Paper · 2006

Effects of Different Girdling Periods on Growth and Fruiting of Grapes Cultured in Shelter from Rain

Wang Xu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of different girdling periods on growth and fruiting in 'lizhmat' and 'Manicure Finger' were researched on the condition of shelter cultivation from rain.The results showed that weights of berry and fruit cluster were increased by stripping,effects of predating maturation and improving quality of fruits were remarkable,and economic benefits of unite area and income of fruit farmers were increased.Judged by general results of girdling,it had the best effect to band girdle on the 20th day after flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased berry and cluster weight.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
strippinge0
Outcome
weights of berry and fruit clustere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“weights of berry and fruit cluster were increased by stripping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling advanced fruit maturation.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
Girdlingt0
Outcome
maturatione0
Direction
predatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Girdling Periods on Growth and Fruiting of Grapes Cultured in Shelter from Rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“effects of predating maturation and improving quality of fruits were remarkable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling improved fruit quality.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
Girdlingt0
Outcome
quality of fruitse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Girdling Periods on Growth and Fruiting of Grapes Cultured in Shelter from Rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“effects of predating maturation and improving quality of fruits were remarkable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased economic benefits per unit area and fruit farmers’ income.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
Girdlingt0
Outcome
economic benefits of unite area and income of fruit farmerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Different Girdling Periods on Growth and Fruiting of Grapes Cultured in Shelter from Rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“economic benefits of unite area and income of fruit farmers were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling on day 20 after flowering gave the best overall effect.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
band girdle on the 20th day after floweringe0
Outcome
best effecte0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“it had the best effect to band girdle on the 20th day after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–515 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 17 positive, 15 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

pruning · phenology · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.