Paper · 2009 · PubMed

[Leaf photosynthetic potential in canopy layers of un-thinned and thinned apple orchards].

Ji-xiang Zhang; Qin-ping Wei; Jing Zhang; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Through the comparison of leaf photosynthetic potential and of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), leaf nitrogen concentration (Nl), and mass per unit leaf area (Ml) in different canopy layers of un-thinned orchard (UOD) and thinned orchard (TOD), this paper studied the effects of UOD rebuilding on the use efficiencies of PAR and nitrogen, and their relationships to the fruit yield and quality. Thinning obviously improved the radiation environment in canopy. The radiation distribution in TOD canopy was more uniformly than that in UOD canopy, and the invalid space with relative PAR (PARr) less than 30% in TOD approached to zero, while the minimum mean PARr in UOD was 17%, and the space under 0. 3 of relative canopy height was invalid. The leaf photosynthetic efficiency in TOD was notably improved. Comparing with that in UOD, the photsynthetic rate (Pn) at the middle and bottom of the canopy in TOD was increased by 7.8% and 10.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, the photosynthetic potential parameters such as maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) and maximum electron transfer rate (Jmax) also increased remarkably in TOD. The leaf photosynthetic potential had significant correlation with Nl, and the Nl was strongly correlated with PARr. As a result, leaf photosynthetic potential and PARr could be estimated according to the spatial distribution of relative leaf nitrogen concentration (Nlr).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning improved the apple canopy radiation environment.

Treatment
Thinninge0
Outcome
radiation environmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thinning obviously improved the radiation environment in canopy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–469 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation was more uniform in thinned than unthinned apple canopy.

Treatment
TODe0
Outcome
radiation distributione0
Direction
more uniformlye0
Comparator
UODe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The radiation distribution in TOD canopy was more uniformly than that in UOD canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The invalid canopy space in thinned apple orchards approached zero.

Outcome
invalid spacee0
Direction
approached to zeroe0
Qualifier
less than 30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the invalid space with relative PAR (PARr) less than 30% in TOD approached to zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum mean relative PAR in unthinned apple orchards was 17%.

Outcome
minimum mean PARre0
Value
17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minimum mean PARr in UOD was 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Space below 0.3 relative canopy height in unthinned apple orchards was invalid.

Outcome
space under 0. 3 of relative canopy height was invalide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the space under 0. 3 of relative canopy height was invalid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinned orchards had improved apple leaf photosynthetic efficiency.

Treatment
TODe0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf photosynthetic efficiency in TOD was notably improved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased apple photosynthetic rate by 7.8% at the middle canopy.

Organ / stage
middlee0
Treatment
TODe0
Outcome
photsynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.8%e0
Comparator
UODe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photsynthetic rate (Pn) at the middle and bottom of the canopy in TOD was increased by 7.8% and 10.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparing with that in UOD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning increased apple photosynthetic rate by 10.2% at the canopy bottom.

Organ / stage
bottome0
Treatment
TODe0
Outcome
photsynthetic rate (Pn)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.2%e0
Comparator
UODe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the photsynthetic rate (Pn) at the middle and bottom of the canopy in TOD was increased by 7.8% and 10.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Comparing with that in UOD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple maximum carboxylation and electron transfer rates rose in thinned orchards.

Treatment
TODe0
Outcome
maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) and maximum electron transfer rate (Jmax)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum carboxylation rate (Vmax) and maximum electron transfer rate (Jmax) also increased remarkably in TOD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaf photosynthetic potential was significantly correlated with leaf nitrogen concentration.

Compound
Nle0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic potentiale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf photosynthetic potential had significant correlation with Nl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaf nitrogen concentration was strongly correlated with relative PAR.

Outcome
Nle0
Setting
PARre0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Nl was strongly correlated with PARr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1248 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative apple leaf nitrogen distribution could estimate leaf photosynthetic potential and relative PAR.

Outcome
leaf photosynthetic potential and PARre0
Comparator
relative leaf nitrogen concentration (Nlr)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf photosynthetic potential and PARr could be estimated according to the spatial distribution of relative leaf nitrogen concentration (Nlr)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–88 · show in text ↑