Abstract
Pot experiments were conducted with three kinds of coated slow released fertilizers(PG、PGg、PGf)which developed by researchers to study the effects of fertilizers on the growth of upland rice.The results indicated that these fertilizers had better nutrient slow releasins characteristics,and soil could retain higher nutrient content for a longer time,and the PGg-coated fertilizer was the best one.Under the same experimental condition,the treatment of PGg-coated fertilizer increased the biomass and plant height comparied with CK,which increased by 15.7% and 12% respectively,the nitrogen use efficiency of PGg-coated fertilizer was 7.5% higher than CK(uncoated treatment),thus reducins nitrogen loss.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The coated fertilizers showed better slow nutrient release.
- Taxon
- Upland Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Outcome
- nutrient slow releasins characteristicse0
- Direction
- bettere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these fertilizers had better nutrient slow releasins characteristics”
t0“Upland Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil retained higher nutrient content for a longer time with coated fertilizers.
- Taxon
- Upland RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- PVA-Coated Slow Released Fertilizert0
- Outcome
- soil could retain higher nutrient contente0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soil could retain higher nutrient content for a longer time”
t0“Effects of PVA-Coated Slow Released Fertilizer Application on Upland Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
PGg was the best coated fertilizer.
- Taxon
- Upland RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- PGg-coated fertilizere0
- Outcome
- the best onee0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the PGg-coated fertilizer was the best one”
t0“Upland Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
PGg increased upland rice biomass by 15.7% over CK.
- Taxon
- Upland RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- PGg-coated fertilizere0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 15.7%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of PGg-coated fertilizer increased the biomass and plant height comparied with CK,which increased by 15.7% and 12% respectively”
t0“Upland Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
PGg increased upland rice plant height by 12% over CK.
- Taxon
- Upland RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- PGg-coated fertilizere0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 12%e0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the treatment of PGg-coated fertilizer increased the biomass and plant height comparied with CK,which increased by 15.7% and 12% respectively”
t0“Upland Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
PGg improved nitrogen use efficiency by 7.5% over uncoated treatment.
- Taxon
- Upland RiceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- PGg-coated fertilizere0
- Outcome
- nitrogen use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 7.5%e0
- Comparator
- CK(uncoated treatment)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the nitrogen use efficiency of PGg-coated fertilizer was 7.5% higher than CK(uncoated treatment)”
t0“Upland Rice”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
216 papers more in this group
See all 220 papers →fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
755 papers more in this group
See all 759 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
989 papers more in this group
See all 993 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.