Paper · 2012 · Xibei nongye xuebao

Effects of Different Pretreatments on Postharvest Quality of Plum Fruit

Sun Yun

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to study different pretreatments on physical-chemical properties and quality of Fraiar and Nai plum,and also to make correlation analysis between firmness and pectin contents of plums.The results showed that in 42 days storage time,chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ could delay the decrease of titratable acidity and firmness,the increase of total soluble solids mass fraction,and inhibit the degradation of cell wall polysaccharide(water soluble pectin,chelate-soluble pectin,sodium carbonate-soluble pectin,hemi cellulose and cellulose) better than other treatments,such as storage at 2 ℃ intermittent warming,2 ℃ calcium treatment,storage at 2 ℃ and storage at 8 ℃.Generally,chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ can keep the texture characteristics of plum fruit better in 42 days storage,the results can provide theoretical basis and technical method for plum storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ delayed the decrease of titratable acidity and firmness in plum better than other treatments over 42 days.

Treatment
chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃e1
Outcome
titratable acidity and firmnesse1
Direction
delaye1
Qualifier
in 42 days storage timee4
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ could delay the decrease of titratable acidity and firmness,the increase of total soluble solids mass fraction,and inhibit the degradation of cell wall polysaccharide(water soluble pectin,chelate-soluble pectin,sodium carbonate-soluble pectin,hemi cellulose and cellulose) better than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–609 · show in text ↑
e3

“quality of Fraiar and Nai plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“in 42 days storage time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ delayed the increase of total soluble solids mass fraction in plum better than other treatments.

Treatment
chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃e1
Outcome
total soluble solids mass fractione1
Direction
delaye1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ could delay the decrease of titratable acidity and firmness,the increase of total soluble solids mass fraction,and inhibit the degradation of cell wall polysaccharide(water soluble pectin,chelate-soluble pectin,sodium carbonate-soluble pectin,hemi cellulose and cellulose) better than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–609 · show in text ↑
e3

“quality of Fraiar and Nai plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ inhibited the degradation of cell wall polysaccharides in plum better than other treatments.

Treatment
chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃e1
Outcome
degradation of cell wall polysaccharidee1
Direction
inhibite1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ could delay the decrease of titratable acidity and firmness,the increase of total soluble solids mass fraction,and inhibit the degradation of cell wall polysaccharide(water soluble pectin,chelate-soluble pectin,sodium carbonate-soluble pectin,hemi cellulose and cellulose) better than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–609 · show in text ↑
e3

“quality of Fraiar and Nai plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ kept the texture characteristics of plum fruit better over 42 days of storage.

Treatment
chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃e2
Outcome
texture characteristicse2
Direction
keepe2
Qualifier
in 42 days storagee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“chitosan coating and calcium treatment at 2 ℃ can keep the texture characteristics of plum fruit better in 42 days storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–842 · show in text ↑
e3

“quality of Fraiar and Nai plum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–129 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

storage · cytology · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.