Paper · 2006

Effects of Sulphur on Grain Starch and Its Components of Spring Wheat Cultivars

Han Zhan-jiang

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of sulphur on grain starch and its compositions were studied by using three spring wheat cultivars with different quality at various levels of nitrogen.Under the given amounts of nitrogen application,the three cultivars needed different amounts of sulphur for them to obtain the highest content of grain starch.Applying sulphur at the levels of urea 60 kg/ha or 128 kg/ha could reduce the ratio between amylose and amylopectin and improve the composition of grain starch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three wheat cultivars required different sulphur amounts for maximum grain starch under given nitrogen.

Taxon
Spring Wheat CultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
Material
three cultivarse0
Outcome
highest content of grain starche0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the given amounts of nitrogen application,the three cultivars needed different amounts of sulphur for them to obtain the highest content of grain starch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application reduced the amylose to amylopectin ratio.

Taxon
Spring Wheat CultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Applying sulphur at the levels of urea 60 kg/ha or 128 kg/hae0
Outcome
ratio between amylose and amylopectine0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sulphur at the levels of urea 60 kg/ha or 128 kg/ha could reduce the ratio between amylose and amylopectin and improve the composition of grain starch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur application improved grain starch composition.

Taxon
Spring Wheat CultivarsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Applying sulphur at the levels of urea 60 kg/ha or 128 kg/hae0
Outcome
composition of grain starche0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying sulphur at the levels of urea 60 kg/ha or 128 kg/ha could reduce the ratio between amylose and amylopectin and improve the composition of grain starch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Wheat Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–79 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 28 positive, 14 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.