Abstract
In this paper,two isolates of arbuscular mycorrhiza(AM) fungi,Glomus versiforme(GV) and Glomus mosseae(GM),were inoculated in non-sterile soil to study their effects on the growth and N and P absorption of Camellia oleifera seedlings through the pot experiment.The results showed that in seven months after inoculation of GV and GM,the infection rate of Camellia oleifera was increased by 56.5% and 72.4% respectively,and 80.5% and 131.3% higher than the control.Compared with the control,although no significantly differences in height and diameter of C.oleifera were no observed in the treatments inoculated with GV,there was a greater increase in the biomass of roots.However,in the treatments inoculated with GM,the height and diameter of Camellia oleifera were significantly increased,and the biomass of aboveground part and roots were significantly greater than that in the control.Nitrogen content in roots of Camellia oleifera seedlings was significantly increased in the GV treatments,while it was reduced in stems and leaves.Both in the treatments inoculated with GM and GV,phosphorus content was increased in roots and stems while it was reduced in the leaves.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
GV inoculation increased infection rate by 56.5%, 80.5% above control.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleiferat0 - Treatment
- inoculation of GVe1
- Interactor
- GV
Betabaculoviruse1symbiont
- Outcome
- infection rate of Camellia oleiferae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 56.5%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“infection rate of Camellia oleifera was increased by 56.5% and 72.4% respectively,and 80.5% and 131.3% higher than the control”
e1“inoculation of GV and GM”
Claim · model-written summary
GM inoculation increased infection rate by 72.4%, 131.3% above control.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- inoculation of GV and GMe1
- Interactor
- GMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- infection rate of Camellia oleiferae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 72.4%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“infection rate of Camellia oleifera was increased by 56.5% and 72.4% respectively,and 80.5% and 131.3% higher than the control”
e1“inoculation of GV and GM”
Claim · model-written summary
GV did not significantly change seedling height and diameter.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GVe0
- Interactor
- GV
- Outcome
- height and diameter of C.oleiferae0
- Direction
- no significantly differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“no significantly differences in height and diameter of C.oleifera were no observed in the treatments inoculated with GV”
Claim · model-written summary
GV increased root biomass.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GVe0
- Interactor
- GV
- Outcome
- biomass of rootse0
- Direction
- greater increasee0
- Comparator
- the controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“treatments inoculated with GV,there was a greater increase in the biomass of roots”
e1“Compared with the control”
Claim · model-written summary
GM significantly increased seedling height and diameter.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GMe0
- Interactor
- GMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- height and diameter of Camellia oleiferae0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“treatments inoculated with GM,the height and diameter of Camellia oleifera were significantly increased”
Claim · model-written summary
GM significantly increased aboveground and root biomass relative to control.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GMe0
- Interactor
- GMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- biomass of aboveground part and rootse0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“treatments inoculated with GM,the height and diameter of Camellia oleifera were significantly increased,and the biomass of aboveground part and roots were significantly greater than that in the control”
Claim · model-written summary
GV significantly increased root nitrogen content.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Treatment
- GV treatmentse0
- Interactor
- GV
- Outcome
- Nitrogen content in rootse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“Nitrogen content in roots of Camellia oleifera seedlings was significantly increased in the GV treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
GV reduced nitrogen content in stems and leaves.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Organ / stage
- stems and leavese0
- Treatment
- GV treatmentse0
- Interactor
- GV
- Outcome
- Nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“Nitrogen content in roots of Camellia oleifera seedlings was significantly increased in the GV treatments,while it was reduced in stems and leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
GM and GV increased phosphorus content in roots and stems.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Organ / stage
- roots and stemse0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GM and GVe0
- Interactor
- GM and GVe0symbiont
- Outcome
- phosphorus contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“Both in the treatments inoculated with GM and GV,phosphorus content was increased in roots and stems”
Claim · model-written summary
GM and GV reduced phosphorus content in leaves.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- inoculated with GM and GVe0
- Interactor
- GM and GVe0symbiont
- Outcome
- phosphorus contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Camellia oleifera Seedlings”
e0“Both in the treatments inoculated with GM and GV,phosphorus content was increased in roots and stems while it was reduced in the leaves”
The same questions in other papers
Funneliformis mosseae · disease · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Funneliformis mosseae · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · disease · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
inoculation · nutrient: content · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.