Abstract
There are Peniciuuium,green mold,anthracnose,sour disease and other types of diseases during citrus fruit transportation and storage.To reduce the losses caused by diseases,the test was conducted in the storage library with natural ventilation.The results indicated that there were significant control effect of 5 fungicides against citrus storage diseases in the conventional dose range.Iminoctadine tris( albesilate) was optimal to control storage disease and sour disease,iprodione second in duration.Prochloraz was optimal to Peniciuuium,green mold and anthracnose,imazalil second.During the storage period of 15~45d,five fungicides had no effect on dehydration rate of the citrus.But they were different after stored for 60d.Comparison with water control,there were no effects on citrus fruit color and appearance,iminoctadine tris( albesilate) and iprodione taste slightly better flavor to60d.Comparison with water control,there were no effect on the citrus fruit nutritional quality indicators after chemical treatments in 15 to 30d.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Five fungicides significantly controlled citrus storage diseases at conventional doses.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“there were significant control effect of 5 fungicides against citrus storage diseases in the conventional dose range”
Claim · model-written summary
Iminoctadine tris( albesilate) best controlled storage and sour disease.
- Treatment
- Iminoctadine tris( albesilate)e0
- Outcome
- control storage disease and sour diseasee0
- Direction
- optimale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Iminoctadine tris( albesilate) was optimal to control storage disease and sour disease”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Iprodione ranked second for duration of control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“iprodione second in duration”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Prochloraz best controlled Peniciuuium, green mold and anthracnose.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Prochloraz was optimal to Peniciuuium,green mold and anthracnose”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Imazalil ranked second for control of the listed diseases.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“imazalil second”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Five fungicides had no effect on citrus dehydration rate after 15 to 45 days.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“During the storage period of 15~45d,five fungicides had no effect on dehydration rate of the citrus”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicides differed in dehydration effect after 60 days.
- Outcome
- different after stored for 60de0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“But they were different after stored for 60d”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical treatments did not affect citrus color or appearance versus water.
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Comparison with water control,there were no effects on citrus fruit color and appearance”
Claim · model-written summary
Iminoctadine tris( albesilate) slightly improved flavor at 60 days.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“iminoctadine tris( albesilate) and iprodione taste slightly better flavor to60d”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Iprodione slightly improved flavor at 60 days.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“iminoctadine tris( albesilate) and iprodione taste slightly better flavor to60d”
t0“citrus storage diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical treatments did not affect citrus nutritional quality indicators at 15 to 30 days versus water.
- Treatment
- chemical treatmentse0
- Outcome
- citrus fruit nutritional quality indicatorse0
- Direction
- no effecte0
- Qualifier
- 15 to 30de0
- Comparator
- water controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Comparison with water control,there were no effect on the citrus fruit nutritional quality indicators after chemical treatments in 15 to 30d”
The same questions in other papers
iminoctadine · control · CitrusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
tris · control · CitrusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
prochloraz · disease · CitrusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fungicide · control · CitrusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.