Paper · 2011 · Northern Horticulture

Effect of Foliar Fertilizer on Grape Quality

Yaozhao Xu

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With ‘Yatomi Rosa’ and ‘Red globe’ trees as materials,sprayed with several foliar fertilizers(‘Chuanchuanjin,’‘Lvwei’,‘Lvbazhixing’,‘Baiwangsiji’)during growth season,the effects of foliar fertilizers on fruit growth and quality were studied.The results showed that simple fruit weight,length,breadth,hardness,vitamin C,sugar content,sugar-acid were increased,while titratable acid of fruit were decreased when applying different foliar fertilizers.‘Chuanchuanjin’ foliar fertilizer was very effective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers increased grape fruit weight, length and breadth.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
foliar fertilizerse1
Outcome
fruit weight,length,breadthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“simple fruit weight,length,breadth,hardness,vitamin C,sugar content,sugar-acid were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“sprayed with several foliar fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers increased grape fruit hardness, vitamin C and sugar content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
foliar fertilizerse1
Outcome
hardness,vitamin C,sugar contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“hardness,vitamin C,sugar content,sugar-acid were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“sprayed with several foliar fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers increased grape fruit sugar-acid ratio.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
foliar fertilizerse1
Outcome
sugar-acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sugar-acid were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“sprayed with several foliar fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 54–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers decreased titratable acid in grape fruit.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
different foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
titratable acid of fruite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“titratable acid of fruit were decreased when applying different foliar fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chuanchuanjin foliar fertilizer was reported very effective.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
‘Chuanchuanjin’ foliar fertilizere0
Outcome
very effectivee0
Direction
very effectivee0

Verbatim

e0

“‘Chuanchuanjin’ foliar fertilizer was very effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–36 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.