Paper · 2008

Response of Winter Wheat Plants of Different Genotypes Grown in the Calcareous Soil to Zinc Fertilization

LU Xin-chun

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization.The effect of zinc fertilization on yield of different wheat genotypes was not significant under the condition of available Zn of 0.6mg kg(DTPA-Zn,) in a calcareous soil in Yangling,and the root to shoot ratios also were not affected by zinc fertilization,but they mainly depended on the genotypes of wheat.However,the Zn concentration and uptake in different parts of the wheat plants substantially increased in zinc fertilization compared to without fertilization.The Zn concentrations in root,stem,leaf and grain of the wheat plants were increased by 0.22-3.22,0.26-2.82,0.10-3.84 and 0.10-0.84 folds,respectively.The Zn uptake in the whole plants was increased by about 28.8-219.3%,and the average value was 104.8%.There existed big difference in translocation rate to zinc among the different wheat genotypes,and the range was 13.5-90.2%.It indicated that the filling stage was a crucial stage for Zn to be translocated from root to spike.Zinc fertilization also increased the available Zn content in the soil.In general,zinc fertilization is an important and effective measure to improve nutritional status of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization did not significantly change yield under low available soil zinc.

Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3
Setting
Yanglinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of zinc fertilization on yield of different wheat genotypes was not significant under the condition of available Zn of 0.6mg kg(DTPA-Zn,) in a calcareous soil in Yangling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-to-shoot ratios were unaffected by zinc fertilization but depended on genotype.

Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
root to shoot ratiose0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the root to shoot ratios also were not affected by zinc fertilization,but they mainly depended on the genotypes of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–473 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc concentration increased in fertilized wheat organs.

Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
without fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Zn concentration and uptake in different parts of the wheat plants substantially increased in zinc fertilization compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root zinc concentration rose 0.22-3.22 fold.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione2
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.22-3.22e0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentrations in root,stem,leaf and grain of the wheat plants were increased by 0.22-3.22,0.26-2.82,0.10-3.84 and 0.10-0.84 folds,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem zinc concentration rose 0.26-2.82 fold.

Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione2
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.26-2.82e0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentrations in root,stem,leaf and grain of the wheat plants were increased by 0.22-3.22,0.26-2.82,0.10-3.84 and 0.10-0.84 folds,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf zinc concentration rose 0.10-3.84 fold.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione2
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.10-3.84e0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentrations in root,stem,leaf and grain of the wheat plants were increased by 0.22-3.22,0.26-2.82,0.10-3.84 and 0.10-0.84 folds,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc concentration rose 0.10-0.84 folds fold.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
zinc fertilizatione2
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.10-0.84 foldse0
Comparator
without fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentrations in root,stem,leaf and grain of the wheat plants were increased by 0.22-3.22,0.26-2.82,0.10-3.84 and 0.10-0.84 folds,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc translocation rate differed markedly among wheat genotypes, from 13.5 to 90.2%.

Outcome
translocation rate to zince0
Value
13.5-90.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There existed big difference in translocation rate to zinc among the different wheat genotypes,and the range was 13.5-90.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend zinc fertilization to improve wheat nutritional status.

Outcome
improve nutritional statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc fertilization is an important and effective measure to improve nutritional status of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–31 · show in text ↑
e2

“A pot experiment was carried out in a plastic greenhouse to investigate the response of bread wheat plants(Triticum aestivum L.) of 20 genotypes to zinc fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
e3

“compared to without fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–632 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.