Abstract
In order to determine an appropriate pruning method of adult precocious walnut trees,10aprecocious walnut trees were used as materials to study the number of new shoots,yield and root activity of four pruning methods(heavy cutting-back,bending branch,heavy cutting-back with bending branch and natural pruning)in 2013.The results showed that the number of new shoots of these four pruning treatments were 32.33,22.67,26.67and 12.67,respectively in the fruit mature period and the number by heavy cuttingback was the biggest.The single fruit weight of the 4treatments was 11.16g,10.53g,12.22g and 11.58g respectively,with the highest by heavy cutting-back with bending branch.Their yields per 667m2 were 129.36kg,154.44kg,155.32kg and 97.24kg,respectively indicating that of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest,followed by bending branch.In the end of the growing season,the root activity of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest among the four pruning treatments which was231.65μg/(g·h)followed by 193.22μg/(g·h)(heavy cutting-back),181.53μg/(g·h)(bending branch),and 150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning),respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy cutting back produced the most new shoots, 32.33.
Verbatim
e0“the number of new shoots of these four pruning treatments were 32.33,22.67,26.67and 12.67,respectively in the fruit mature period and the number by heavy cuttingback was the biggest”
t0“walnut”
e1“heavy cutting-back,bending branch,heavy cutting-back with bending branch and natural pruning”
e2“150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning)”
Claim · model-written summary
Branch bending produced 22.67 new shoots.
Verbatim
e0“the number of new shoots of these four pruning treatments were 32.33,22.67,26.67and 12.67,respectively in the fruit mature period”
t0“walnut”
e1“heavy cutting-back,bending branch,heavy cutting-back with bending branch and natural pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined cutting back and bending produced 26.67 new shoots.
Verbatim
e0“the number of new shoots of these four pruning treatments were 32.33,22.67,26.67and 12.67,respectively in the fruit mature period”
t0“walnut”
e1“heavy cutting-back,bending branch,heavy cutting-back with bending branch and natural pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural pruning produced 12.67 new shoots.
Verbatim
e0“the number of new shoots of these four pruning treatments were 32.33,22.67,26.67and 12.67,respectively in the fruit mature period”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined pruning gave the highest single fruit weight, 12.22 g.
Verbatim
e0“The single fruit weight of the 4treatments was 11.16g,10.53g,12.22g and 11.58g respectively,with the highest by heavy cutting-back with bending branch.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined pruning yielded 155.32 kg per 667 square metres, the highest yield.
Verbatim
e0“Their yields per 667m2 were 129.36kg,154.44kg,155.32kg and 97.24kg,respectively indicating that of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest,followed by bending branch.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Bending branch yielded 154.44 kg per 667 square metres, second highest.
Verbatim
e0“Their yields per 667m2 were 129.36kg,154.44kg,155.32kg and 97.24kg,respectively indicating that of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest,followed by bending branch.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy cutting back yielded 129.36 kg per 667 square metres.
Verbatim
e0“Their yields per 667m2 were 129.36kg,154.44kg,155.32kg and 97.24kg,respectively indicating that of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest,followed by bending branch.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural pruning yielded 97.24 kg per 667 square metres.
Verbatim
e0“Their yields per 667m2 were 129.36kg,154.44kg,155.32kg and 97.24kg,respectively indicating that of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest,followed by bending branch.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined pruning had the highest root activity at 231.65 μg/(g·h).
Verbatim
e0“the root activity of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest among the four pruning treatments which was231.65μg/(g·h)followed by 193.22μg/(g·h)(heavy cutting-back),181.53μg/(g·h)(bending branch),and 150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning),respectively.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Heavy cutting back had root activity of 193.22 μg/(g·h).
Verbatim
e0“the root activity of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest among the four pruning treatments which was231.65μg/(g·h)followed by 193.22μg/(g·h)(heavy cutting-back),181.53μg/(g·h)(bending branch),and 150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning),respectively.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Branch bending had root activity of 181.53 μg/(g·h).
Verbatim
e0“the root activity of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest among the four pruning treatments which was231.65μg/(g·h)followed by 193.22μg/(g·h)(heavy cutting-back),181.53μg/(g·h)(bending branch),and 150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning),respectively.”
t0“walnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural pruning had root activity of 150.60 μg/(g·h).
Verbatim
e0“the root activity of heavy cutting-back with bending branch was the highest among the four pruning treatments which was231.65μg/(g·h)followed by 193.22μg/(g·h)(heavy cutting-back),181.53μg/(g·h)(bending branch),and 150.60μg/(g·h)(natural pruning),respectively.”
t0“walnut”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Juglans (walnuts)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.