Paper · 2011 · Tianjin Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves

Zhang ChaoXuan

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of microbial fertilizer on soil ecosystem and chlorophyll fluorescence of grape leaves.The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces,remedy the soil ecology,improved soil fertility,reduced soil bulk density,increased the cation exchange capility and increased soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium content.The treatments used microbial fertilizer also could increased the chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics parameters,Φ_(PSⅡ),Fv/Fm,qP and deceased non-photochemical quenching efficient(NPQ) in grape leaves.This indicates antimicrobial fertilizer could enhance light utilization efficiency of grape leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer increased soil bacteria, fungi and actinomyces.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
soil bacteria fungi and actinomycese1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer improved soil fertility.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
soil fertilitye2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“remedy the soil ecology,improved soil fertility,reduced soil bulk density,increased the cation exchange capility and increased soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer reduced soil bulk density.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
soil bulk densitye2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“remedy the soil ecology,improved soil fertility,reduced soil bulk density,increased the cation exchange capility and increased soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer increased the cation exchange capacity of the soil.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
cation exchange capilitye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“remedy the soil ecology,improved soil fertility,reduced soil bulk density,increased the cation exchange capility and increased soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer increased soil available phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium content.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere1
Outcome
soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium contente2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that used microbial fertilizer could increase soil bacteria fungi and actinomyces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–194 · show in text ↑
e2

“remedy the soil ecology,improved soil fertility,reduced soil bulk density,increased the cation exchange capility and increased soil available phosphorus,nitrogen and potassium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer increased chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics parameters of grape leaves.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
microbial fertilizere3
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics parameterse3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on the Soil Ecosystem and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Grape Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatments used microbial fertilizer also could increased the chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer decreased non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) in grape leaves.

Taxon
grapee4
Treatment
microbial fertilizere3
Outcome
non-photochemical quenching efficient(NPQ)e4
Direction
deceasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3

“The treatments used microbial fertilizer also could increased the chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–489 · show in text ↑
e4

“deceased non-photochemical quenching efficient(NPQ) in grape leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial fertilizer could enhance light utilization efficiency of grape leaves.

Taxon
grapee5
Treatment
microbial fertilizere5
Outcome
light utilization efficiencye5
Direction
enhancee5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“This indicates antimicrobial fertilizer could enhance light utilization efficiency of grape leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–677 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · VitisPositive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisPositive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · soil: physics · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.