Paper · 2013

Effectof Rhizosphere Heating Pattern Improving the Growth and Quality of Hydroponic Rape in Chinese Solar Greenhouse During Winter

LI Ya-fe

12
claims
48
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Change of soil temperature lagging behind air temperature in solar greenhouse, which leads that they cannot achieve the suitable physiological temperature required simultaneously and this phenomenon is unfavorable to the plant growth. In this experiment, hydroponics rape test was carried on with different treatments to study the effects of rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)on rape growth, yield and quality. Results show that the rhizosphere heating can improve the rape growth significantly. The leaf chlorophyll content of heating treatment was increased by 23.65% than no heating treatment, the CAT activity was increased slightly and no significant difference was found in SOD activity. The plant height was increased by51.23%significantly;While there was no significant difference in leaf number. Also, the rhizosphere heating pattern makes the yield increased significantly. The rape seedlings' shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight were increased by85.34%;232.61%;81.74% and 141.93%.Meanwhile, the rhizosphere heating pattern can improve the quality of the hydroponic rape. Vc content of rape leaves was increased by 38.64%,while the nitrate content was decreased slightly. Results of this study provide certain theory reference of rhizosphere heating pattern to improve the hydroponic rape yield and quality of Chinese solar greenhouse in winter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased leaf chlorophyll content by 23.65% versus no heating.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
23.65%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The leaf chlorophyll content of heating treatment was increased by 23.65% than no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–612 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating slightly increased CAT activity.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
CAT activitye1
Direction
increased slightlye1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“the CAT activity was increased slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–653 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity showed no significant difference with heating.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
SOD activitye1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant difference was found in SOD activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–709 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating significantly raised plant height by 51.23%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
51.23%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant height was increased by51.23%significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–763 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf number showed no significant difference with heating.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
leaf numbere1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no significant difference in leaf number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating significantly increased yield.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“the rhizosphere heating pattern makes the yield increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–899 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased seedling shoot fresh weight by 85.34%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
85.34%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rape seedlings' shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight were increased by85.34%;232.61%;81.74% and 141.93%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased seedling root fresh weight by 232.61%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
232.61%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rape seedlings' shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight were increased by85.34%;232.61%;81.74% and 141.93%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased seedling shoot dry weight by 81.74%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
81.74%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rape seedlings' shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight were increased by85.34%;232.61%;81.74% and 141.93%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased seedling root dry weight by 141.93%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
shoot and root fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
141.93%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rape seedlings' shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight were increased by85.34%;232.61%;81.74% and 141.93%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1015 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating increased rape leaf Vc content by 38.64%.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
Vc content of rape leavese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38.64%e1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“Vc content of rape leaves was increased by 38.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1155 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heating slightly decreased nitrate content.

Treatment
rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)e0
Outcome
nitrate contente1
Direction
decreased slightlye1
Comparator
no heating treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Hydroponic Rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“rhizosphere heating pattern((21±1)℃and 10:00-14:00)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–393 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nitrate content was decreased slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“no heating treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–612 · show in text ↑

heat · molecular: metabolites · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

heat · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

heat · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 3 positive, 19 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.