Paper · 2013 · Shengtaixue zazhi

Effects of low-pressure sprinkler irrigation on spatiotemporal distribution of nitrogen in soil-wheat system and wheat grain yield

Ke Wang; Zhiqiang Wang; Chao Ma; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to establish an efficient irrigation model to save water and fertilizer for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of different water application amounts of low-pressure sprinkler irrigation on the spatiotemporal distribution of nitrogen in soil-winter wheat system and the wheat grain yield, with the traditional surface irrigation (flooding irrigation) as the control. Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the soil compaction significantly, increased the soil urease activity after flowering stage, and made the soil NO3--N and NH4+-N concentrated in 0-60 cm root zone, preventing the further leakage of water and fertilizer nitrogen. As compared with flooding irrigation, low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the peak of ammonia volatilization rate and the total amount of ammonia volatilization significantly, and increased the total nitrogen content and nitrogen transport rate of plant leaves, sheaths, and stems considerably. Both the wheat grain yield and the water- and nitrogen use efficiency under low-pressure sprinkler irrigation were increased to different extent, and the treatment with 15% reduction of water application amount obtained the highest grain yield and the highest water- and nitrogen use efficiency while the least losses of water and fertilizer nitrogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation significantly decreased soil compaction.

Treatment
Low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
soil compactione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the soil compaction significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–506 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the traditional surface irrigation (flooding irrigation) as the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation increased soil urease activity after flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
Low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione1
Outcome
soil urease activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased the soil urease activity after flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–564 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the traditional surface irrigation (flooding irrigation) as the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation concentrated soil nitrate and ammonium nitrogen in the 0-60 cm root zone and prevented further nutrient leakage.

Organ / stage
root zonee0
Treatment
Low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione1
Outcome
soil NO3--N and NH4+-Ne0
Direction
concentratede0
Value
0-60 cme0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“made the soil NO3--N and NH4+-N concentrated in 0-60 cm root zone, preventing the further leakage of water and fertilizer nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–701 · show in text ↑
e1

“Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the traditional surface irrigation (flooding irrigation) as the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation significantly decreased peak ammonia volatilization rate compared with flooding irrigation.

Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
peak of ammonia volatilization ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“As compared with flooding irrigation, low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the peak of ammonia volatilization rate and the total amount of ammonia volatilization significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation significantly decreased total ammonia volatilization compared with flooding irrigation.

Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
total amount of ammonia volatilizatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“As compared with flooding irrigation, low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the peak of ammonia volatilization rate and the total amount of ammonia volatilization significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased nitrogen content in wheat leaves, sheaths and stems.

Organ / stage
plant leaves, sheaths, and stemse0
Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione1
Outcome
total nitrogen contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased the total nitrogen content and nitrogen transport rate of plant leaves, sheaths, and stems considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–792 · show in text ↑
e2

“As compared with flooding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased nitrogen transport rate in wheat leaves, sheaths and stems.

Organ / stage
plant leaves, sheaths, and stemse0
Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione1
Outcome
nitrogen transport ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increased the total nitrogen content and nitrogen transport rate of plant leaves, sheaths, and stems considerably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“low-pressure sprinkler irrigation decreased the peak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–792 · show in text ↑
e2

“As compared with flooding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the wheat grain yield and the water- and nitrogen use efficiency under low-pressure sprinkler irrigation were increased to different extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As compared with flooding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased wheat water-use efficiency.

Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
water-e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the wheat grain yield and the water- and nitrogen use efficiency under low-pressure sprinkler irrigation were increased to different extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As compared with flooding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased wheat nitrogen-use efficiency.

Treatment
low-pressure sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
flooding irrigatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the wheat grain yield and the water- and nitrogen use efficiency under low-pressure sprinkler irrigation were increased to different extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“As compared with flooding irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 15% reduction in water application produced the highest grain yield and water and nitrogen-use efficiency, with the least water and fertilizer nitrogen losses.

Treatment
15% reduction of water application amounte0
Outcome
highest grain yield and the highest water- and nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
least losses of water and fertilizer nitrogene0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment with 15% reduction of water application amount obtained the highest grain yield and the highest water- and nitrogen use efficiency while the least losses of water and fertilizer nitrogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1356 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · environment: emissions · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 25 positive, 14 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.