Paper · 2012 · Journal of Peanut Science

The Effects of Different Genotype Maize on Fe Nutrition of Intercropped Peanut

Guozhan Fu

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the field experiment,the effects of maize on Fe nutrition of intercropped peanut were studied.The results showed: Compared with the sole-cropping peanut,maize intercropped peanut improved the Fe concentration of intercropped peanut in stem,leaf and kernel,promoted the peanut Fe absorbing capacity;Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.The capacity of different genotype maize on Fe nutrition improvement of intercropped peanut was: TD21ZD958DH661.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping maize increased peanut Fe concentration in stem, leaf and kernel.

Treatment
maize intercropped peanute0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
Fe concentration of intercropped peanut in stem,leaf and kernele0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
sole-cropping peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the sole-cropping peanut,maize intercropped peanut improved the Fe concentration of intercropped peanut in stem,leaf and kernel,promoted the peanut Fe absorbing capacity;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize intercropping promoted peanut Fe absorption capacity.

Treatment
maize intercropped peanute0
Interactor
maizeZea mayse0other
Outcome
peanut Fe absorbing capacitye0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
sole-cropping peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the sole-cropping peanut,maize intercropped peanut improved the Fe concentration of intercropped peanut in stem,leaf and kernel,promoted the peanut Fe absorbing capacity;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut seed Fe concentration increased with ZD958 intercropping by 42.77%~48.47%.

Material
ZD958e0
Treatment
intercropped with ZD958e0
Outcome
Fe concentration in seeds of peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.77%~48.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut seed Fe concentration increased with DH 661 intercropping by 16.42%~19.9%.

Material
DH 661e0
Treatment
DH 661e0
Outcome
Fe concentration in seeds of peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.42%~19.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut seed Fe concentration increased with TD 21 intercropping by 53.83%~60.94%.

Material
TD 21e0
Treatment
TD 21e0
Outcome
Fe concentration in seeds of peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
53.83%~60.94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut Fe accumulation increased with ZD958 intercropping by 45.27%~57.83%.

Material
ZD958e0
Treatment
ZD958e0
Outcome
Fe accumulation of intercropped peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45.27%~57.83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut Fe accumulation increased with DH 661 intercropping by 7.07%~13.22%.

Material
DH 661e0
Treatment
DH 661e0
Outcome
Fe accumulation of intercropped peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.07%~13.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut Fe accumulation increased with TD 21 intercropping by 98.47%~160.99%.

Material
TD 21e0
Treatment
TD 21e0
Outcome
Fe accumulation of intercropped peanute0
Direction
increasede0
Value
98.47%~160.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe concentration in seeds of peanut intercropped with ZD958,DH 661 and TD 21 was increased by 42.77%~48.47%,16.42%~19.9% and 53.83%~60.94%,respectively,which achieved significant difference level,and Fe accumulation of intercropped peanut was increased by 45.27%~57.83%、7.07%~13.22% and 98.47%~160.99%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–616 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize genotypes differed in their improvement of peanut Fe nutrition.

Material
TD21ZD958DH661e0
Outcome
Fe nutrition improvement of intercropped peanute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The capacity of different genotype maize on Fe nutrition improvement of intercropped peanut was: TD21ZD958DH661.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–728 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.