Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Mixed cropping with five grasses improved peanut iron nutrition.

A claim from [Effects of peanut mixed cropping with different gramineous plants on apoplast iron accumulation and reducing capacity of peanut]. · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed cropping with five grasses improved peanut iron nutrition.

Treatment
mixed cropping of maize, barley, oats, wheat, and sorghume0
Outcome
iron nutrition of peanute0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed cropping of maize, barley, oats, wheat, and sorghum with peanut could improve iron nutrition of peanut respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–328

Title

[Effects of peanut mixed cropping with different gramineous plants on apoplast iron accumulation and reducing capacity of peanut].

Yuanmei Zuo; Fusuo Zhang PubMed 2004

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4e63c854a7afd9aca84ffa196dd191b3ac06ac0e1bcada399c9831f93834d592 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Triticum aestivum · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

intercropping · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.