Paper · 2011 · Zhongguo tangliao

Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet

Zhan Yao-dong

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the 3414 fertilizer experimental design,the experiment was conducted to determine the effects of N,P and K fertilizer application and recommendation for sugarbeet.The results showed that the rational ratio of N,P and K improved the sugarbeet yield,content and input-output ratio.The maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha and increased by 44.94%;the maximum sugar yield was 12978.47 kg/ha and increased by 38.97%,in comparison with the non-fertilizer application.By establishing the fertilizer response equation,the optimum ferterlizer ratios of root yield and sugar yield of sugarbeet were as(N∶P2O5∶K2O) 1∶1.4∶1 and 1∶1.7∶1,respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A rational N, P and K ratio improved sugarbeet yield, content and input-output ratio.

Treatment
rational ratio of N,P and Ke0
Outcome
yield,content and input-output ratioe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“the rational ratio of N,P and K improved the sugarbeet yield,content and input-output ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha under N, P and K fertilizer application.

Treatment
N,P,K Fertilizer Applicationt0
Outcome
maximum root yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
80458.33 kg/hae0
Comparator
non-fertilizer applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha and increased by 44.94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with the non-fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root yield of sugarbeet increased by 44.94% under N, P and K fertilizer application compared with no fertilizer.

Treatment
N,P,K Fertilizer Applicationt0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.94%e0
Comparator
non-fertilizer applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha and increased by 44.94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“in comparison with the non-fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum sugar yield of sugarbeet was 12978.47 kg/ha under N, P and K fertilizer application.

Treatment
N,P,K Fertilizer Applicationt0
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
12978.47 kg/hae1
Comparator
non-fertilizer applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha and increased by 44.94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum sugar yield was 12978.47 kg/ha and increased by 38.97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with the non-fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar yield of sugarbeet increased by 38.97% under N, P and K fertilizer application compared with no fertilizer.

Treatment
N,P,K Fertilizer Applicationt0
Outcome
sugar yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
38.97%e1
Comparator
non-fertilizer applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum root yield of sugarbeet was 80458.33 kg/ha and increased by 44.94%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–366 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum sugar yield was 12978.47 kg/ha and increased by 38.97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–433 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with the non-fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–483 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum N:P2O5:K2O ratio for sugarbeet root yield is 1:1.4:1.

Outcome
optimum ferterlizer ratios of root yielde0
Value
1∶1.4∶1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimum ferterlizer ratios of root yield and sugar yield of sugarbeet were as(N∶P2O5∶K2O) 1∶1.4∶1 and 1∶1.7∶1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–659 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum N:P2O5:K2O ratio for sugarbeet sugar yield is 1:1.7:1.

Outcome
sugar yielde0
Value
1∶1.7∶1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of N,P,K Fertilizer Application and Recommendation for Sugerbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimum ferterlizer ratios of root yield and sugar yield of sugarbeet were as(N∶P2O5∶K2O) 1∶1.4∶1 and 1∶1.7∶1,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–659 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

potassium · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

58 papers: 52 positive, 6 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

103 papers: 66 positive, 37 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

phosphorus · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 142 positive, 19 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.