Paper · 2012 · Turang feiliao

Effect of different fertilization measures on yield,quality and economic benefits of tomato under protected cultivation

Zhang Li-li

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different fertilization on yield,quality and economic benefits of tomato was studied in this paper.The results showed that yield and economic benefit were increased and quality was improved by optimize fertilization and optimize fertilization combining with ameliorant.Compared with farmer practical fertilization,yield of tomato and economic benefits were increased by 20.5% and 36.9%,19 400 yuan/ha and 45 200 yuan/ha in optimize fertilization and optimize fertilization combining with potassium humate and Zeolite respectively.The content of Vc was improved by 15.1 mg/kg and 35.6 mg/kg respectively;And the proportion of sugar to acid was 1.24 times and 1.65 times,respectively;The content of nitrate and nitrite were decreased.Comprehensive consideration from yield,quality and economic benefits,the effects of optimize fertilization combining with potassium humate and Zeolite was best.Potassium humate was better than Zeolite,and applying potassium humate could promote tomato maturity about 5 days to 7 days.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization increased tomato yield by 20.5%.

Treatment
different fertilization measurest0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.5%e0
Comparator
farmer practical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with farmer practical fertilization,yield of tomato and economic benefits were increased by 20.5% and 36.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different fertilization measures on yield,quality and economic benefits of tomato under protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized fertilization increased economic benefits by 36.9%.

Treatment
different fertilization measurest0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.9%e0
Comparator
farmer practical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with farmer practical fertilization,yield of tomato and economic benefits were increased by 20.5% and 36.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of different fertilization measures on yield,quality and economic benefits of tomato under protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments improved vitamin C content and sugar-to-acid ratio.

Outcome
content of Vce0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The content of Vc was improved by 15.1 mg/kg and 35.6 mg/kg respectively;And the proportion of sugar to acid was 1.24 times and 1.65 times,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate and nitrite contents decreased.

Outcome
content of nitrate and nitritee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The content of nitrate and nitrite were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate was better than Zeolite.

Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Zeolitee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium humate was better than Zeolite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium humate advanced tomato maturity by 5 to 7 days.

Treatment
potassium humatee0
Outcome
tomato maturitye0
Direction
promotee0
Value
5 days to 7 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying potassium humate could promote tomato maturity about 5 days to 7 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1029 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

potassium · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.