Paper · 2006 · Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban

Research on fresh-keeping of cut Rosa hybrida flowers with different matching preservatives

Zonggen Shen

5
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With GA3 being main preservative,the effects of different matching preservative treatments on vase-life and moisture balance of cut roses were studied. The results showed that the prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3) could remarkably extend the vase life of cut rosa hybrida flower by 2. 01 days and keep it in full flower in 2. 80 days and promote 1. 95 cm in the flower diameter (P0. 01),obviously delaying the decline of the moisture balance and the zero data's appearance of the cut rose's fresh weight variation. Every index was superior to other prescriptions and control. It indicates that prescription H is the best preservative in the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prescription H extended cut Rosa hybrida vase life by 2. 01 days versus other prescriptions and control.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3)e0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
extende0
Value
2. 01 dayse0
Comparator
other prescriptions and controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3) could remarkably extend the vase life of cut rosa hybrida flower by 2. 01 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–372 · show in text ↑
e1

“Every index was superior to other prescriptions and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prescription H kept cut flowers in full flower for 2. 80 days.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
prescription He2
Outcome
full flowere0
Value
2. 80 dayse0
Comparator
other prescriptions and controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“keep it in full flower in 2. 80 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Every index was superior to other prescriptions and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
e2

“the prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Prescription H increased cut flower diameter by 1. 95 cm.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
prescription He1
Outcome
flower diametere0
Direction
promotee0
Value
1. 95 cme0
Comparator
other prescriptions and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“promote 1. 95 cm in the flower diameter (P0. 01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–466 · show in text ↑
e1

“the prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“Every index was superior to other prescriptions and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prescription H delayed decline of moisture balance and the zero point of fresh weight variation in cut flowers.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
prescription He1
Outcome
moisture balance and the zero data's appearance of the cut rose's fresh weight variatione0
Direction
delayinge0
Comparator
other prescriptions and controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“obviously delaying the decline of the moisture balance and the zero data's appearance of the cut rose's fresh weight variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“the prescription H (mass fraction of 10 g/L sucrose + mass fraction of 200 mg/L 8-HQ + mass fraction of 100 mg/L GA3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–293 · show in text ↑
e2

“Every index was superior to other prescriptions and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified prescription H as the best preservative tested.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Outcome
prescription H is the best preservativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rosa hybrida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“prescription H is the best preservative in the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–731 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.