Abstract
A 2 year field experihent cQducte~ afNew Delhi revealed that pendimethalin (pre-emergence) and lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds, whereas 2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds In wheat (Tntrcum aestlvum L. ) . Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soil were less effective as cornoared to emend Fiori & Paol , . . . their spray application. Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years, but was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92, but proved superior to isoproturon (suspension) in 1992-93. No significant difference was observed between pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and suspension) when applied after first irrigation. Increase in grain yield was up to 18 and 12 qha in 1991 -32 and : respectively. 992-33
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Pendimethalin before emergence controlled grassy and broad-leaved weeds more effectively.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- pendimethalin (pre-emergence)e0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- broad-leaved weedse0
- Direction
- more effecrivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“pendimethalin (pre-emergence) and lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Isoproturon after first irrigation controlled grassy and broad-leaved weeds more effectively.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdione0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- broad-leaved weedse0
- Direction
- more effecrivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
2,4-D was effective only against broad-leaved weeds.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 2,4-De0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- broad-leaved weedse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluroxypyr was effective only against broad-leaved weeds.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- fluroxypyre0
- Interactor
- weedse0weed
- Outcome
- broad-leaved weedse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing isoproturon with urea or soil was less effective than spray application.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soile0
- Outcome
- less effectivee0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
- Comparator
- their spray applicatione0
Not reportedInteractor
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soil were less effective as cornoared to emend Fiori & Paol , . . . their spray application”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave higher grain yield in both years.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Hand-weedinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedInteractorComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon after irrigation in 1991-92.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Hand-weedinge1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- at pare0
- Qualifier
- 1991-92e0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92”
e1“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding outperformed isoproturon suspension in 1992-93.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Hand-weedinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Qualifier
- 1992-93e0
- Comparator
- isoproturon (suspension)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years, but was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92, but proved superior to isoproturon (suspension) in 1992-93”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
Claim · model-written summary
Pendimethalin and isoproturon after first irrigation did not differ significantly.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- pendimethaline0
- Outcome
- differencee0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
- Comparator
- isoproturon ( w and suspension)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“No significant difference was observed between pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and suspension) when applied after first irrigation”
t0“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
The same questions in other papers
pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →fluroxypyr · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
397 papers more in this group
See all 401 papers →herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
559 papers more in this group
See all 563 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.