Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of time and method of isoproturon application on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

JITENDRA PANDEY; RAJVIR SHARMA; R. P. SINGH; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 2 year field experihent cQducte~ afNew Delhi revealed that pendimethalin (pre-emergence) and lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds, whereas 2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds In wheat (Tntrcum aestlvum L. ) . Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soil were less effective as cornoared to emend Fiori & Paol , . . . their spray application. Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years, but was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92, but proved superior to isoproturon (suspension) in 1992-93. No significant difference was observed between pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and suspension) when applied after first irrigation. Increase in grain yield was up to 18 and 12 qha in 1991 -32 and : respectively. 992-33

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin before emergence controlled grassy and broad-leaved weeds more effectively.

Treatment
pendimethalin (pre-emergence)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weedse0
Direction
more effecrivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin (pre-emergence) and lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–202 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon after first irrigation controlled grassy and broad-leaved weeds more effectively.

Treatment
lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weedse0
Direction
more effecrivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lsoproturon ( w ) applied after first irfigdion were more effecrive against both &sy and broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–202 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D was effective only against broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluroxypyr was effective only against broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
fluroxypyre0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
broad-leaved weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2,4-D and fluroxypyr only against broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing isoproturon with urea or soil was less effective than spray application.

Treatment
Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soile0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
their spray applicatione0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isoproturon ( w ) mixed w ~ t hurea and soil were less effective as cornoared to emend Fiori & Paol , . . . their spray application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–430 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding gave higher grain yield in both years.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon after irrigation in 1991-92.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
at pare0
Qualifier
1991-92e0
Comparator
pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–604 · show in text ↑
e1

“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding outperformed isoproturon suspension in 1992-93.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
1992-93e0
Comparator
isoproturon (suspension)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand-weeding resulted in higher grain yield in both the years, but was at par with pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and its suspension) applied aftir irrigation in 1991-92, but proved superior to isoproturon (suspension) in 1992-93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin and isoproturon after first irrigation did not differ significantly.

Treatment
pendimethaline0
Outcome
differencee0
Direction
No significant differencee0
Comparator
isoproturon ( w and suspension)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant difference was observed between pendimethalin and isoproturon ( w and suspension) when applied after first irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–100 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 46 positive, 2 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fluroxypyr · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.