Paper · 2015

Effects of Different Nitrogen Forms on Spring Maize Yield,N Use Efficiency and Soil Nitrate Nitrogen

JI De-zh

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer types on the maize yield, variation of soil nitrate content in the 0-90 cmlayers with maize growing stages and nitrogen use efficiency(NUE) were carried out on a typical black soil in a fieldexperiment. The results showed that the 90 cm deep soil layer, soil residual nitrate was elevated by the applicationof nitrogen fertilizer by about 30%, but it decreased too with the growing stages of maize, and common urea re-mained 20% higher than that of control at harvest. Compared with common urea, soil nitrate content of controlled-re-lease nitrogen fertilizer decreased slowly in the early stage and fast in the lately stage, soil residual nitrate contentwas lower. Controlled-release compound fertilizer could meet the demand for maize growth earlier stage and laterstage of soil nitrate nitrogen, improve yield and maximize nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency to 55.41% and achievethe purpose of single fertilization. Yields and N use efficiency of sulfur coated urea fertilizer by single fertilizationwere the lowest. Compared with the other nitrogen treatments, there was a significant difference with those.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer application elevated soil residual nitrate at 90 cm depth by about 30%.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilizere1
Outcome
soil residual nitratee1
Direction
elevatede1
Value
about 30%e1
Qualifier
90 cm deep soil layere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 90 cm deep soil layer, soil residual nitrate was elevated by the applicationof nitrogen fertilizer by about 30%, but it decreased too with the growing stages of maize, and common urea re-mained 20% higher than that of control at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–498 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil residual nitrate decreased with the growing stages of maize.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
growing stagese1
Outcome
soil residual nitratee1
Direction
decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 90 cm deep soil layer, soil residual nitrate was elevated by the applicationof nitrogen fertilizer by about 30%, but it decreased too with the growing stages of maize, and common urea re-mained 20% higher than that of control at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common urea left soil residual nitrate 20% higher than the control at harvest.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
common ureae1
Outcome
soil residual nitratee1
Direction
highere1
Value
20%e1
Qualifier
at harveste1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“the 90 cm deep soil layer, soil residual nitrate was elevated by the applicationof nitrogen fertilizer by about 30%, but it decreased too with the growing stages of maize, and common urea re-mained 20% higher than that of control at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release compound fertilizer maximized nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency to 55.41%.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Controlled-release compound fertilizere3
Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer use efficiencye3
Direction
maximizee3
Value
55.41%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Controlled-release compound fertilizer could meet the demand for maize growth earlier stage and laterstage of soil nitrate nitrogen, improve yield and maximize nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency to 55.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release compound fertilizer improved maize yield.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Controlled-release compound fertilizere3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
improvee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Controlled-release compound fertilizer could meet the demand for maize growth earlier stage and laterstage of soil nitrate nitrogen, improve yield and maximize nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency to 55.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release compound fertilizer could meet the demand for maize growth at early and late stages.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Controlled-release compound fertilizere3
Outcome
demand for maize growthe3
Direction
could meete3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e3

“Controlled-release compound fertilizer could meet the demand for maize growth earlier stage and laterstage of soil nitrate nitrogen, improve yield and maximize nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency to 55.41%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields and N use efficiency of sulfur coated urea fertilizer applied as a single fertilization were the lowest.

Taxon
Spring MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sulfur coated urea fertilizere4
Outcome
Yields and N use efficiencye4
Direction
the loweste4
Qualifier
by single fertilizatione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“Yields and N use efficiency of sulfur coated urea fertilizer by single fertilization were the lowest”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 950–1049 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

189 papers: 174 positive, 15 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 403 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,026 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.