Abstract
This research investigated appropriate indoor light sources and light intensities for Hedera rhombea and Saxifraga stolonifera, which are shade-tolerant and cold-resistant indoor plants. Plants were grown in wood flames of 1 m in width1 m in length1 m in height. Light sources were fluorescent lamp, three wave fluorescent lamp and halogen lamp that are being used in most of the subway stations in Korea, and light intensities were 200 Lux, 700 Lux and 1,000 Lux. Results are as following. 1. Hedera rhombea Hedera rhombea heights did not show differences statistically as responses to light sources and light intensities. It, however, tended to be greater with an order of 1,000 Lux, 700 Lux and 200 Lux and halogen lamp, fluorescent lamp, and three wave fluorescent lamp. Number of branch increased under fluorescent lamp than under halogen lamp or three wave fluorescent lamp, and increased under higher light intensities. Number of leaf was higher with an order of three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux, fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and halogen lamp 1,000 Lux. Leaf shape became wider under low light intensities regardless of light sources. Chlorophyl contents in leaf were not significantly different under three wave fluorescent lamp and halogen lamp. However, the contents increased with an order of 200 Lux, 700 Lux and 1,000 Lux under fluorescent lamp. 2. Saxifraga stolonifera The plants were dead or declined under fluorescent lamp regardless of light intensities. When light intensities went under 200 Lux, Saxifraga stolonifera showed poor growth for all the light sources. Plant height, number of shoot, number of leaf, leaf width and leaf length have increased with an order of halogen lamp 1,000 Lux, three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Lux. Chlorophyl content was greater with an order of three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Lux, three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and halogen lamp 1,000 Lux.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera height did not differ statistically across light sources or intensities.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombea
Hedera rhombeae0 - Treatment
- light sources and light intensitiese0
- Outcome
- heightse0
- Direction
- did not show differencese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hedera rhombea heights did not show differences statistically as responses to light sources and light intensities.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera height tended to rise with intensity and was greatest under halogen light.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- 1,000 Lux, 700 Lux and 200 Luxe0
- Outcome
- greatere0
- Direction
- greatere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It, however, tended to be greater with an order of 1,000 Lux, 700 Lux and 200 Lux and halogen lamp, fluorescent lamp, and three wave fluorescent lamp.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera branch number increased under fluorescent light and higher intensities.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- fluorescent lampe0
- Outcome
- Number of branche0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- halogen lamp or three wave fluorescent lampe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of branch increased under fluorescent lamp than under halogen lamp or three wave fluorescent lamp, and increased under higher light intensities.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera leaf number ranked highest under three-wave fluorescent light at 1,000 Lux.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Luxe0
- Outcome
- Number of leafe0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Number of leaf was higher with an order of three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux, fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and halogen lamp 1,000 Lux.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera leaves were wider under low light intensity.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- low light intensitiese0
- Outcome
- Leaf shapee0
- Direction
- widere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf shape became wider under low light intensities regardless of light sources.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera chlorophyll did not differ between three-wave fluorescent and halogen light.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- three wave fluorescent lampe0
- Outcome
- Chlorophyl contents in leafe0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
- Comparator
- halogen lampe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorophyl contents in leaf were not significantly different under three wave fluorescent lamp and halogen lamp.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Hedera chlorophyll increased with fluorescent-light intensity.
- Taxon
- Hedera rhombeaHedera rhombeat0
- Treatment
- fluorescent lampe0
- Outcome
- the contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the contents increased with an order of 200 Lux, 700 Lux and 1,000 Lux under fluorescent lamp.”
t0“Hedera rhombea”
Claim · model-written summary
Saxifraga plants died or declined under fluorescent light.
- Taxon
- Saxifraga stolonifera
Saxifraga stoloniferat0 - Treatment
- fluorescent lampe0
- Outcome
- dead or declinede0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The plants were dead or declined under fluorescent lamp regardless of light intensities.”
t0“Saxifraga stolonifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Saxifraga grew poorly below 200 Lux under all light sources.
- Taxon
- Saxifraga stoloniferaSaxifraga stoloniferae0
- Treatment
- under 200 Luxe0
- Outcome
- poor growthe0
- Direction
- poor growthe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When light intensities went under 200 Lux, Saxifraga stolonifera showed poor growth for all the light sources.”
Claim · model-written summary
Saxifraga height, shoot and leaf number ranked highest under halogen light at 1,000 Lux.
- Taxon
- Saxifraga stoloniferaSaxifraga stoloniferat0
- Treatment
- halogen lamp 1,000 Luxe0
- Outcome
- Plant height, number of shoot, number of leafe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height, number of shoot, number of leaf, leaf width and leaf length have increased with an order of halogen lamp 1,000 Lux, three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Lux.”
t0“Saxifraga stolonifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Saxifraga leaf width and length ranked highest under halogen light at 1,000 Lux.
- Taxon
- Saxifraga stoloniferaSaxifraga stoloniferat0
- Treatment
- halogen lamp 1,000 Luxe0
- Outcome
- leaf width and leaf lengthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height, number of shoot, number of leaf, leaf width and leaf length have increased with an order of halogen lamp 1,000 Lux, three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Lux.”
t0“Saxifraga stolonifera”
Claim · model-written summary
Saxifraga chlorophyll was greatest under three-wave fluorescent light at 700 Lux.
- Taxon
- Saxifraga stoloniferaSaxifraga stoloniferat0
- Treatment
- three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Luxe0
- Outcome
- Chlorophyl contente0
- Direction
- greatere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorophyl content was greater with an order of three wave fluorescent lamp 700 Lux, three wave fluorescent lamp 1,000 Lux and halogen lamp 1,000 Lux.”
t0“Saxifraga stolonifera”