Abstract
The effects of different irrigation methods on the consumption characteristics and yield of summer corn were investigated based on different water treatments.The results showed that(1)the higher the control limit of moisture content is,the greater the water consumption is;(2)the water consumption of the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern is lower than that of the conventional furrow planting pattern under the same water treatment during the growing period,and the impoundment effect of soil moisture is good;(3)under different furrow irrigation methods,the corn yield and water use efficiency are significantly different,and the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern generates higher yield and improves the water use efficiency.The average increasing rate of yield is 8.67%,and the increased water use efficiency is 0.23 to 0.36kg/m3;and(4) too low or too high moisture treatments can cause adverse effects on the corn yield and its component factors.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
A higher moisture control limit increased water consumption.
- Taxon
- summer corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- control limit of moisture contente1
- Outcome
- water consumptione1
- Direction
- greatere1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer corn”
e1“the higher the control limit of moisture content is,the greater the water consumption is”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated ridge tillage furrow planting reduced growing period water consumption relative to conventional furrow planting.
- Taxon
- summer cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- integrated ridge tillage furrow planting patterne1
- Outcome
- water consumptione1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Qualifier
- under the same water treatment during the growing periode1
- Comparator
- conventional furrow planting patterne1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer corn”
e1“the water consumption of the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern is lower than that of the conventional furrow planting pattern under the same water treatment during the growing period”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated ridge tillage furrow planting had good soil moisture impoundment.
- Taxon
- summer cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- integrated ridge tillage furrow planting patterne2
- Outcome
- impoundment effect of soil moisture is goode1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“summer corn”
e1“the impoundment effect of soil moisture is good”
e2“the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern is lower”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn yield differed significantly across furrow irrigation methods.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- different furrow irrigation methodse1
- Outcome
- corn yielde0
- Direction
- differente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn yield and water use efficiency are significantly different”
e1“under different furrow irrigation methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Water use efficiency differed significantly across furrow irrigation methods.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- different furrow irrigation methodse1
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- differente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn yield and water use efficiency are significantly different”
e1“under different furrow irrigation methods”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated ridge tillage furrow planting raised corn yield by an average 8.67%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- integrated ridge tillage furrow planting patterne1
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Direction
- highere1
- Value
- 8.67%e2
- Comparator
- conventional furrow planting patterne3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the corn yield and water use efficiency are significantly different”
e1“the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern generates higher yield”
e2“The average increasing rate of yield is 8.67%”
e3“conventional furrow planting pattern”
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated ridge tillage furrow planting increased corn water use efficiency by 0.23 to 0.36kg/m3.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- integrated ridge tillage furrow planting patterne1
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 0.23 to 0.36kg/m3e1
- Comparator
- conventional furrow planting patterne2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“corn yield and water use efficiency”
e1“the integrated ridge tillage furrow planting pattern generates higher yield and improves the water use efficiency.The average increasing rate of yield is 8.67%,and the increased water use efficiency is 0.23 to 0.36kg/m3”
e2“conventional furrow planting pattern”
Claim · model-written summary
Very low or high moisture treatments adversely affected corn yield and its component factors.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- too low or too high moisture treatmentse1
- Outcome
- corn yield and its component factorse1
- Direction
- adverse effectse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“too low or too high moisture treatments can cause adverse effects on the corn yield”
e1“too low or too high moisture treatments can cause adverse effects on the corn yield and its component factors”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
320 papers more in this group
See all 324 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.