Paper · 1992 · HortScience

Hydrogen Cyanamide-induced Budbreak and Phytotoxicity in `Redhaven' Peach Buds

Jorge H. Siller-Cepeda; Leslie H. Fuchigami; Tony H.H. Chen

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
31
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of hydrogen cyanamide (H 2 CN 2 ) on budbreak and phytotoxicity of l-year-old potted peach trees [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. cv. Redhaven] over a wide range of concentrations at several stages of dormancy were studied. Endodormancy (180° GS; degree growth stage) began on 1 Oct. Maximum intensity of endodormancy (270° GS) was reached after the plants were exposed to 320 chill units on 1 Nov., and 50% of the buds were broken at 860 chill units on 1 Dec. Five concentrations of H 2 C N 2 (0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 m ) were applied on 1 and 15 Oct., 1 and 15 Nov., and 1 and 15 Dec. 1990. All concentrations promoted budbreak; however, percent budbreak and phytotoxicity depended on concentration and timing of application. The most effective concentration (greatest budbreak and lowest phytotoxicity) was 0.125 m H 2 CN 2 on all treatment dates. Phytotoxicity was evident at all application dates but was greatest at the highest concentrations. Plants were most resistant to H 2 CN 2 at maximum intensity of endodormancy. Hydrogen cyanamide-induced budbreak was highest during the later stages of endodormancy (295 to 315° GS). Treatments applied during the ecodormancy stage (340° GS) inhibited and delayed budbreak and damaged buds and stems. Chemical name used: hydrogen cyanamide (H 2 CN 2 , Dormex).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endodormancy began on 1 October at 180° GS.

Outcome
Endodormancye0
Value
180° GSe0
Qualifier
1 Oct.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endodormancy (180° GS; degree growth stage) began on 1 Oct.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum endodormancy intensity was reached at 270° GS after 320 chill units on 1 November.

Outcome
intensity of endodormancye0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
270° GSe0
Qualifier
320 chill units on 1 Nov.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum intensity of endodormancy (270° GS) was reached after the plants were exposed to 320 chill units on 1 Nov.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half the buds had broken at 860 chill units on 1 December.

Outcome
buds were brokene0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
860 chill units on 1 Dec.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% of the buds were broken at 860 chill units on 1 Dec.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested concentrations promoted budbreak.

Treatment
Hydrogen Cyanamidet0
Outcome
budbreake0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All concentrations promoted budbreak; however, percent budbreak and phytotoxicity depended on concentration and timing of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hydrogen Cyanamide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
t1

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Budbreak percentage and phytotoxicity depended on concentration and application timing.

Treatment
concentration and timing of applicatione0
Outcome
percent budbreak and phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“percent budbreak and phytotoxicity depended on concentration and timing of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.125 m treatment gave greatest budbreak on every treatment date.

Treatment
0.125 m H 2 CN 2e0
Outcome
budbreake0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
on all treatment datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective concentration (greatest budbreak and lowest phytotoxicity) was 0.125 m H 2 CN 2 on all treatment dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.125 m treatment gave lowest phytotoxicity on every treatment date.

Treatment
0.125 m H 2 CN 2e0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
on all treatment datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective concentration (greatest budbreak and lowest phytotoxicity) was 0.125 m H 2 CN 2 on all treatment dates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytotoxicity occurred at every application date and was greatest at the highest concentrations.

Treatment
highest concentrationse0
Outcome
Phytotoxicitye0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
evident at all application datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytotoxicity was evident at all application dates but was greatest at the highest concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants were most resistant to hydrogen cyanamide at maximum endodormancy intensity.

Outcome
resistant to H 2 CN 2e0
Direction
moste0
Qualifier
at maximum intensity of endodormancye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants were most resistant to H 2 CN 2 at maximum intensity of endodormancy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Induced budbreak was highest during later endodormancy at 295 to 315° GS.

Treatment
Hydrogen cyanamidee0
Outcome
budbreake0
Direction
higheste0
Value
295 to 315° GSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hydrogen cyanamide-induced budbreak was highest during the later stages of endodormancy (295 to 315° GS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecodormancy applications inhibited and delayed budbreak.

Treatment
Treatments applied during the ecodormancy stagee0
Outcome
budbreake0
Direction
inhibited and delayede0
Qualifier
340° GSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments applied during the ecodormancy stage (340° GS) inhibited and delayed budbreak and damaged buds and stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ecodormancy applications damaged buds and stems.

Treatment
Treatments applied during the ecodormancy stagee0
Outcome
damaged buds and stemse0
Qualifier
340° GSe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments applied during the ecodormancy stage (340° GS) inhibited and delayed budbreak and damaged buds and stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑

cyanamide · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.