Paper · 2013 · PubMed

A synergistic effect in controlling plum postharvest diseases occurs by applying UV-C light to sodium bicarbonate treated fruit.

G D'Hallewin; L Cubaiu; G Ladu; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effectiveness of ultraviolet-C light (UV-C; 254 nm) alone at 0, 3, 6 and 12 kJm(-2), or combined with 0.0 or 0.5% (w7v) sodium bicarbonate (SBC), to control plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley) postharvest decay caused by Penicillium expansum L. and Botrytis cinerea was investigated. First, fruit was sanitized and in one experiment plums were artificially wound-inoculated 24 h before treatments and afterwards kept at 25 degrees C with 90% RH for 7 days. In the second experiment, treatments were applied before fruit was spray-contaminated with conidia and then stored for 4 weeks at 5 degrees C and 90% RH (storage conditions). In both experiments, the highest degree of decay caused by the two pathogens was monitored when fruit stayed untreated (control), and a negligible reduction was achieved by treating with the sole salt or with a 3 kJm(-2) UV-C light. Compared to control (89 +/- 3% decay), the treatment of wound-inoculated fruit with 6 kJm(-2) provided a 35 and 38% reduction of P. expansum and B. cinerea decay, respectively. Meanwhile, 12 kJm(-2) provided an additional decrease of 25 and 27%, respectively. In both experiments, the best control of decay was attained when treatments with SBC and UV-C light were combined and the efficacy depended upon the sequence of application. Synergistic effects were found by applying the salt before UV-C light. When 6 or 12 kJm(-2) were employed following the 2% SBC treatment, no disease symptoms developed for either pathogens in both experiments. The same combination with 3 kJm(-2) resulted in a nearly 5 fold increase of efficacy compared to the sole light treatment. The combined treatments controlled the two pathogens to valuable levels and, since no quality losses were observed during storage, they could be considered as a suitable approach to contain postharvest losses of this fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plum had the highest decay from both pathogens.

Treatment
untreated (control)e0
Outcome
degree of decaye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both experiments, the highest degree of decay caused by the two pathogens was monitored when fruit stayed untreated (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium bicarbonate alone gave negligible decay reduction.

Treatment
sole salte0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
negligible reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a negligible reduction was achieved by treating with the sole salt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 3 kJm(-2) alone gave negligible decay reduction.

Treatment
3 kJm(-2) UV-C lighte0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
negligible reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a negligible reduction was achieved by treating with the sole salt or with a 3 kJm(-2) UV-C light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 6 kJm(-2) reduced P. expansum decay by 35% versus control.

Treatment
6 kJm(-2)e0
Interactor
P. expansumPenicillium expansume0pathogen
Outcome
P. expansume0
Direction
reductione0
Value
35e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium expansum
Penicillium expansum · InteractorH.J. Larsen, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control (89 +/- 3% decay), the treatment of wound-inoculated fruit with 6 kJm(-2) provided a 35 and 38% reduction of P. expansum and B. cinerea decay, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 6 kJm(-2) reduced B. cinerea decay by 38% versus control.

Treatment
6 kJm(-2)e0
Interactor
B. cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
B. cinerea decaye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
38%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to control (89 +/- 3% decay), the treatment of wound-inoculated fruit with 6 kJm(-2) provided a 35 and 38% reduction of P. expansum and B. cinerea decay, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 12 kJm(-2) gave a further 25% decrease in P. expansum decay.

Treatment
12 kJm(-2)e0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
25e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meanwhile, 12 kJm(-2) provided an additional decrease of 25 and 27%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C at 12 kJm(-2) gave a further 27% decrease in B. cinerea decay.

Treatment
12 kJm(-2)e0
Outcome
decreasee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Meanwhile, 12 kJm(-2) provided an additional decrease of 25 and 27%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined SBC and UV-C provided the best decay control in both experiments.

Treatment
SBC and UV-C lighte0
Outcome
control of decaye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both experiments, the best control of decay was attained when treatments with SBC and UV-C light were combined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying salt before UV-C had synergistic effects.

Treatment
applying the salt before UV-C lighte0
Outcome
Synergistic effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Synergistic effects were found by applying the salt before UV-C light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 2% SBC followed by 6 kJm(-2) UV-C, no disease symptoms developed.

Treatment
6e0
Outcome
no disease symptoms developede0
Qualifier
2% SBC treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When 6 or 12 kJm(-2) were employed following the 2% SBC treatment, no disease symptoms developed for either pathogens in both experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 2% SBC followed by 12 kJm(-2) UV-C, no disease symptoms developed.

Treatment
12 kJm(-2)e0
Outcome
no disease symptoms developede0
Qualifier
2% SBC treatmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When 6 or 12 kJm(-2) were employed following the 2% SBC treatment, no disease symptoms developed for either pathogens in both experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined 3 kJm(-2) treatment gave nearly fivefold higher efficacy than light alone.

Treatment
combination with 3 kJm(-2)e0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
nearly 5 folde0
Comparator
sole light treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same combination with 3 kJm(-2) resulted in a nearly 5 fold increase of efficacy compared to the sole light treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments caused no observed quality loss during storage.

Outcome
quality lossese0
Direction
no quality lossese0
Setting
during storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no quality losses were observed during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1764 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider combined treatments suitable to contain plum postharvest losses.

Outcome
suitable approach to contain postharvest lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they could be considered as a suitable approach to contain postharvest losses of this fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“plum (Prunus domestica cv Stanley)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–195 · show in text ↑