Abstract
Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus oryzae were compared for inducing the production of prenylated stilbenoids in peanut seedlings. The fungus was applied at two different time points: directly after soaking (day 1) or after 2 days of germination (day 3). Aspergillus- and Rhizopus-elicited peanut seedlings accumulated an array of prenylated stilbenoids, with overlap in compounds induced, but also with compounds specific to the fungal treatment. The differences were confirmed to be due to modification of prenylated stilbenoids by the fungus itself. Each fungus appeared to deploy different strategies for modification. The content of prenylated stilbenoids modified by fungi accounted for around 8% to 49% (w/w) of total stilbenoids. The contents of modified prenylated stilbenoids were higher when the fungus was applied on day 1 instead of day 3. Altogether, type of fungus and time point of inoculation appeared to be crucial parameters for optimizing accumulation of prenylated stilbenoids in peanut seedlings.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Aspergillus elicitation accumulated prenylated stilbenoids, including shared and fungus-specific compounds.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Aspergillus-e0
- Interactor
- Aspergillus
Aspergilluse0other - Outcome
- prenylated stilbenoidse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Aspergillus- and Rhizopus-elicited peanut seedlings accumulated an array of prenylated stilbenoids, with overlap in compounds induced, but also with compounds specific to the fungal treatment.”
e1“Aspergillus- and Rhizopus-elicited peanut seedlings accumulated an array of prenylated stilbenoids, with overlap in compounds induced, but also with compounds specific to the fungal treatment.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizopus elicitation accumulated prenylated stilbenoids, including shared and fungus-specific compounds.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Rhizopus-elicitede0
- Outcome
- prenylated stilbenoidse0
_spores%2C_which_is_green_using_Light_Microscope%2C_Normal_image_without_any_coloring_or_processing_By_researcher_El_sayed_Al_gayar%2C_Faculty_of_Agriculture_Damietta_University.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
RhizopusNot reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_spores%2C_which_is_green_using_Light_Microscope%2C_Normal_image_without_any_coloring_or_processing_By_researcher_El_sayed_Al_gayar%2C_Faculty_of_Agriculture_Damietta_University.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Aspergillus- and Rhizopus-elicited peanut seedlings accumulated an array of prenylated stilbenoids, with overlap in compounds induced, but also with compounds specific to the fungal treatment.”
e1“Aspergillus- and Rhizopus-elicited peanut seedlings accumulated an array of prenylated stilbenoids, with overlap in compounds induced, but also with compounds specific to the fungal treatment.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
Claim · model-written summary
The fungi themselves modified the elicited prenylated stilbenoids.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- modification of prenylated stilbenoidse0
- Qualifier
- by the fungus itselfe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The differences were confirmed to be due to modification of prenylated stilbenoids by the fungus itself.”
e1“The differences were confirmed to be due to modification of prenylated stilbenoids by the fungus itself.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
Claim · model-written summary
Each fungus appeared to use a different modification strategy.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- different strategies for modificatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Each fungus appeared to deploy different strategies for modification.”
e1“Each fungus appeared to deploy different strategies for modification.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungus-modified stilbenoids made up around 8% to 49% of total stilbenoids.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Outcome
- content of prenylated stilbenoids modified by fungie0
- Value
- 8% to 49% (w/w)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The content of prenylated stilbenoids modified by fungi accounted for around 8% to 49% (w/w) of total stilbenoids.”
e1“The content of prenylated stilbenoids modified by fungi accounted for around 8% to 49% (w/w) of total stilbenoids.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
Claim · model-written summary
Day 1 fungal application produced more modified prenylated stilbenoids than day 3 application.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- applied on day 1e0
- Outcome
- contents of modified prenylated stilbenoidse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- day 3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The contents of modified prenylated stilbenoids were higher when the fungus was applied on day 1 instead of day 3.”
e1“The contents of modified prenylated stilbenoids were higher when the fungus was applied on day 1 instead of day 3.”
t0“Modification of Prenylated Stilbenoids in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Seedlings by the Same Fungi That Elicited Them: The Fungus Strikes Back”
The same questions in other papers
Aspergillus · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.